![]() |
|
01-11-2017
|
16 |
|
of Orange
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 826
|
Not going to start this stupid argument again, but the new cone hat looks better than the old one. Better than the one that was won by people accomplishing something. Sure makes sense. That's where the problem lies, not the fact that its "different in design" (which, lets be honest it's a cone. You can't change the overall concept for a cone that much) |
|
01-11-2017
|
17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 430
|
You have to take into perspective the time period when it was made too though. I think the old cone is a testimony to your long time success as a sparrer while the new cone represents the stricter and more evolved graphics style classic adheres to.
|
|
01-11-2017
|
18 |
|
michael
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 3,511
|
|
|
01-11-2017
|
19 |
|
Should be fixed.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,359
|
Join the team and make better hats then.
|
|
01-11-2017
|
20 | |
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
Leah admitted she was clueless that it was a GST hat - as well as another which was just 4 months prior (which really makes it seem like she doesn't care about the quality of them) Her friends then proceeded to roleplay as staff for the next 10 pages, which is already what's happening in this thread On topic though, I don't think we should hold it against iClassic staff for rehashing public hats and stuff like that… They should obviously do what they can to avoid remaking hats too similar to GST hats or other prize/exclusive hats though For example, the latest news post specifically advertises these Bazaar hats as "limited time" and that can be interpreted two ways:
|
|
|
01-11-2017
|
21 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,215
|
'and while your at it, can you explain why hat shop updates are bad for the game'*while also making thread moaning about hats* wtf, this guy for real.
|
|
01-11-2017
|
22 | |||
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
I remember when Coco was head of GFX staff (rather than an all-around developer, or whatever she is now), she'd actually participate in threads where people had concerns about too-similar 1k hats and stuff like that, and usually at the end of the thread everyone would leave either happy or understanding of her decision. I'm sure that wasn't a requirement, but it's a nice courtesy. Leah's resolution to David's issue was one reply, some form of this:
|
|||
|
01-11-2017
|
23 |
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
"your post made sense and it was hard to reply to so now i'm going to beat my chest like a gorilla because i no longer hold myself to the standard of having an intelligent conversation" wp man, thanks for your time |
|
01-11-2017
|
24 |
|
(Sage)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 886
|
There's nothing wrong with having more animal-themed ears. Tbh, as basic as it sounds, I'd like the gfx team to make a flower crown(like the one on Snapchat) or a leaf crown. I've only seen like 2 hats so far with the same theme, but I think the last one was made 2~3 years ago(?).
|
|
01-11-2017
|
25 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,255
|
I think you're missing the point here, I pay money for gralats to purchase hats, as the person purchasing your product I have the right to be unhappy about the quality of items on offer.
Like thallen brought up, why would the head of the gfx team not check the servers files to see if a hat similar to the one being reviewed has not already been made, it makes me question whether or not leah actually gives a ****. |
||
|
01-11-2017
|
26 | |
|
cute frog
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,644
|
To be fair Thallen I understand where your frustration roots from and I would be upset if the same thing would happen to me. I agree with you when you say that Leah should have double checked to see if the hat already existed but I think you're kinda dragging this on a bit. What's done is done and personally I think they should have changed the hat the second something was pointed out, but then again if they did that then they would have to do that for a dozen of other hats and items that I'm sure people complained about during Christmas. However I think this is dragging on a bit and I think what's done is done. And I'm not trying to "role play" as a staff member, I'm giving you an actual response and I'm not trying to start anything. But again I think it's time to stop complaining about this and hopefully it doesn't happen again. Personally I think both sides handled the situation poorly and I don't really have a stance on this since I never wanted to be involved with it in the first place.
As for the GFX thing I don't really know what happened with that since I don't talk to Leah at all anymore and since it was the holidays I didn't feel like contributing to the **** storm that the previous thread was. |
|
|
01-12-2017
|
27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,468
|
|
|
01-12-2017
|
28 |
|
Should be fixed.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,359
|
There are literally hundreds and hundreds of hats, and there is no 'quick lookup' to see if an idea exists. Making sure hat ideas don't exist depends mostly on personal knowledge of hats... So staff trying to remember hundreds of hats made over years of work and staff. Also you're not being forced to buy these hats so you can easily just save your gralats for later purchases. |
|
01-12-2017
|
29 | ||
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
Specifically this:
|
||
|
01-12-2017
|
30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,468
|
|