New Guild System! - 11

Red · 10-31-2016

I agree on the reward hats, why remove them so early if the system hasn't been released.
There is nothing to do on graal single sparring is cancer, there is no reason to guild spar or tower without an incentive.

PK and Bk is so repetitive its straight up boring.

Saber Alumba · 10-31-2016

Posted by ReD s.

I agree on the reward hats, why remove them so early if the system hasn't been released.
There is nothing to do on graal single sparring is cancer, there is no reason to guild spar or tower without an incentive.

PK and Bk is so repetitive its straight up boring.

This .

alexx · 11-02-2016

Can we at least get an confirm date onto when this will be realeased? Or if you guys are still even working on it?

G Fatal · 11-02-2016

Forget about release for a second.
Now can A Staff member actually explain how the system will work exactly as majority of the answers are by a player

..(if guilds earn points from pk/bk/spar/forts-how you going to balance that?)Like what's the plan.

James205 · 11-02-2016

Kind of wish the amount of guilds a player can be can be increased while we wait on this.

Macbeth · 11-02-2016

Posted by James205

Kind of wish the amount of guilds a player can be can be increased while we wait on this.

Towering is broken enough at the moment. I can see the point of this to a social or sparring guild. However, for towering, it would just cause a monopolization of certain towers, given they can just kick inactive members.
Without a backlash to kicking members, then there is no reason for an increase.

James205 · 11-02-2016

Posted by iMac

Towering is broken enough at the moment. I can see the point of this to a social or sparring guild. However, for towering, it would just cause a monopolization of certain towers, given they can just kick inactive members.
Without a backlash to kicking members, then there is no reason for an increase.

I mean it's really annoying right now outside of towering. If it's going to take a while to make the new guild system then something minor should atleast be done. The guild limit really has been more annoying and I thought it was a good idea at first (still do if a better system comes out)

Macbeth · 11-02-2016

Posted by James205

I mean it's really annoying right now outside of towering. If it's going to take a while to make the new guild system then something minor should atleast be done. The guild limit really has been more annoying and I thought it was a good idea at first (still do if a better system comes out)

I definitely agree with you. I hope with the new system that the members gets increased, however that there is a backlash for kicking members. In this way it would bring meaning to the guild's whole and to it's members.
I would hope, that in order to appease the masses, that they would devise a type of party system. In this way, you could easily disband or kick inactive members without worry of losing points to your guild. The parties would not be able to take a tower, but would be used more of a way of communication. One can still hit a party member with their weapons.

James205 · 11-02-2016

Posted by iMac

I definitely agree with you. I hope with the new system that the members gets increased, however that there is a backlash for kicking members. In this way it would bring meaning to the guild's whole and to it's members.
I would hope, that in order to appease the masses, that they would devise a type of party system. In this way, you could easily disband or kick inactive members without worry of losing points to your guild. The parties would not be able to take a tower, but would be used more of a way of communication. One can still hit a party member with their weapons.

Yeah exactly.

They could just make temp social guild type thing too, whatever is easiest and temporary tbh

fp4 · 11-03-2016

Posted by iMac

I hope with the new system that the members gets increased

It will be.

Pokki · 11-03-2016

Posted by fp4

It will be.

my body is ready

Rekkles · 11-03-2016

I hear that they will be making towering more like ol' west where you can earn points by staying in the tower but there will no doubt be a few dominative guilds meaning no one can take the tower .-.

Agonee · 11-03-2016

there always some "dominative" guilds, it makes the game more competetive and more fun to the players.

G Fatal · 11-04-2016

Increasing members is horrible idea they'll be no competition once a main guild organisers so he has active players and all keep on tag,so no need for kicking. Just imagine main hat hunting groups merging into 1 covering all timezones, I mean you can say they used the rec/kick method but majority of guilds that get 1k or more have atleast 15main/active loyal members so they wouldn't even need the kicking option as more space is supplied for them anyway.

twilit · 11-04-2016

Posted by G Fatal

Increasing members is horrible idea they'll be no competition once a main guild organisers so he has active players and all keep on tag,so no need for kicking. Just imagine main hat hunting groups merging into 1 covering all timezones, I mean you can say they used the rec/kick method but majority of guilds that get 1k or more have atleast 15main/active loyal members so they wouldn't even need the kicking option as more space is supplied for them anyway.

People already did that with subs. And there's been discussion of possibly removing allies, which would actually lower tower guilds' member pool. There's also been discussion of punishing guilds that have high member turnover (guilds that recruit and kick noobs and subs).

11-02-2016	154
G Fatal Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: UK Posts: 3,215	Forget about release for a second. Now can A Staff member actually explain how the system will work exactly as majority of the answers are by a player..(if guilds earn points from pk/bk/spar/forts-how you going to balance that?)Like what's the plan.

10-31-2016	151
Red Banned Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Australia Posts: 3,255	I agree on the reward hats, why remove them so early if the system hasn't been released. There is nothing to do on graal single sparring is cancer, there is no reason to guild spar or tower without an incentive. PK and Bk is so repetitive its straight up boring.

11-02-2016	153
alexx Registered User Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: stranger danger :// Posts: 320	Can we at least get an confirm date onto when this will be realeased? Or if you guys are still even working on it?

11-02-2016	155
James205 The Shaded Leg Join Date: May 2012 Location: NYC Posts: 556	Kind of wish the amount of guilds a player can be can be increased while we wait on this.

11-03-2016	162
Rekkles Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: North England Posts: 302	I hear that they will be making towering more like ol' west where you can earn points by staying in the tower but there will no doubt be a few dominative guilds meaning no one can take the tower .-.

11-03-2016	163
Agonee (D19) & (Rek em) Join Date: May 2015 Location: Germany Posts: 945	there always some "dominative" guilds, it makes the game more competetive and more fun to the players.

11-04-2016	164
G Fatal Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: UK Posts: 3,215	Increasing members is horrible idea they'll be no competition once a main guild organisers so he has active players and all keep on tag,so no need for kicking. Just imagine main hat hunting groups merging into 1 covering all timezones, I mean you can say they used the rec/kick method but majority of guilds that get 1k or more have atleast 15main/active loyal members so they wouldn't even need the kicking option as more space is supplied for them anyway.