![]() |
12-07-2015
|
125 | |
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
It's like if Jared Cunningham were to jump off of the Cavs bench and say, "PLAY ME 1-ON-1 RIGHT NOW" to LeBron James... If you were worth sparring then people would probably spar you. Work your way up or something. Break the streak record. Win a GST. Consistently beat good sparrers. Force people to spar and acknowledge you by queuing. At the end of the day, people are going to do what they want. If so few good sparrers are sparring, I don't see how you aren't dominating. Based on what I see on the iDevice leaderboard, it's the exact same people sparring actively and dominantly. |
|
12-07-2015
|
126 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: my momma basement
Posts: 63
|
|
|
12-08-2015
|
132 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 934
|
I'd spar more if the old leaderboard was still being used. The current leaderboard is pointless, just shows who plays the most/ who is the biggest no life. The old leaderboard showed more skill and doesn't require you to sit on graal for excessive hours to be in the top 5-10. Rewards would also encourage me to spar actively and so would a leaderboard in which the top 10 qualified you into being registered into a single spar tournament. Also a spar lag cap of 200-250ms (depending on the time of day) would make sparring more enjoyable.
|
12-08-2015
|
135 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 19
|
It was a rating system. You gained and lost points depending on your points and the points of your opponent. So sparing just noobs or people with low score would never get you number 1 but sparing other active top tier sparers would allow u to climb the leader boards and really show ur skill
|