The multiple server idea is good to reduce lag. But it would definitely cripple gameplay. For example:

• Towering would have less competition, people would go on a server which has not many on / low guild holding tower
• Boosting would be made easier as there wouldn't be enough staff to police all servers at once, nor would Classic be in a position to employ more.
• Sparring would be less active, because people would join another server to streak. This again leaves door open to boosters.
• What if events were held on the server you weren't on? People complain about the weighted queue system now, but a slim chance is better than no chance right?

I can go on and on.  

Posted by Droid

The multiple server idea is good to reduce lag. But it would definitely cripple gameplay. For example:

• Towering would have less competition, people would go on a server which has not many on / low guild holding tower
• Boosting would be made easier as there wouldn't be enough staff to police all servers at once, nor would Classic be in a position to employ more.
• Sparring would be less active, because people would join another server to streak. This again leaves door open to boosters.
• What if events were held on the server you weren't on? People complain about the weighted queue system now, but a slim chance is better than no chance right?

I can go on and on.

1. Maybe focus 2 servers on towering, and 2 servers on sparring? (If one server is packed full of people and lag, they can go on a different server to spar?) like take away spar and towers on all the other servers, and put them on 2 "main" servers?

2. Idea: If a player kill another player 5 or 10 times, make it so kills won't add after that? (Use IP to track noob accounts? If the noob account is using the same IP as the person who was killed 10 times, the kills won't count for the same person trying to kill?)

3. Look back at number 1.

4. Events messages will be cross-servers? Once the staff sent out the event message, it goes out to all servers?  

Oh man, how have we never thought of this?!?!?!?!??!?!?!!?!!  

Posted by Wolfie

1. Maybe focus 2 servers on towering, and 2 servers on sparring? (If one server is packed full of people and lag, they can go on a different server to spar?) like take away spar and towers on all the other servers, and put them on 2 "main" servers?

2. Idea: If a player kill another player 5 or 10 times, make it so kills won't add after that? (Use IP to track noob accounts? If the noob account is using the same IP as the person who was killed 10 times, the kills won't count for the same person trying to kill?)

3. Look back at number 1.

4. Events messages will be cross-servers? Once the staff sent out the event message, it goes out to all servers?

Counter Arguments:

1. This would kill acivity on the worlds without towers and also would mean less players in forts anyways, not everyone is there to take the tower.
2. This happens anyway, but using multiple Ip trackers over multiple servers will probably add to the lag and slow the game down. What if there are two players PKing on the same network?
3. Please stop trying to convince yourself this is a good idea, my previous points were enough to show that it would dissect the community completely and ruin this game.

Why not just UPGRADE the one server we have? or just play on PC where there is no freezing ever? :0  

I'd love if they added servers with little clever names to them, like "Server Taylor Richaards", OR servers that are named after the top guilds  

Wouldn't work cuz what the hell would they do about cross server towering ... Like what if a guild on server one had a tower and some guild members from the same guild went on server two and took a tower... Would it still be double hours since it's not on one server??? Confusing  

Posted by Wolfie

But it's known as iClassic, Classic iPhone, iOS Classic, Classic iOS



My wifi is pretty stable. And I'm using a iPad 2 :o is iPad 2 considered as an old device now?



I don't own a PC, well I do, but it's not functioning (broken)

Really? None of the users on here agrees with this idea?

Oh well, I guess I can do nothing about that



What about the framerate decrease?

Framerate drops are also a result of weak devices.  

First guild to 50,000 hours gets their own server only only they can enter.  

Posted by Kendama

First guild to 50,000 hours gets their own server only only they can enter.

Then they'd capture all their towers...  

you make this sound like it's so easy though
it's like saying "if your house has bad insulation, just buy a new one"  

Posted by Thallen

you make this sound like it's so easy though
it's like saying "if your house has bad insulation, just buy a new one"

No, not at all. I know developments can take forever, even if they are implementing this (which I highly doubt now that I see some say that many have disagree), it would take a long time

Yes, you may look at this that way, but in this case, it's more like renting an apartment to wait for your house to finish the construction. You can always go back on the server you like, your "main" server when less players are on it.

Posted by Terd

Wouldn't work cuz what the hell would they do about cross server towering ... Like what if a guild on server one had a tower and some guild members from the same guild went on server two and took a tower... Would it still be double hours since it's not on one server??? Confusing

-You cannot take this tower because your guild already have a tower on another server!-

Posted by Droid

Counter Arguments:

1. This would kill acivity on the worlds without towers and also would mean less players in forts anyways, not everyone is there to take the tower.
2. This happens anyway, but using multiple Ip trackers over multiple servers will probably add to the lag and slow the game down. What if there are two players PKing on the same network?
3. Please stop trying to convince yourself this is a good idea, my previous points were enough to show that it would dissect the community completely and ruin this game.

Why not just UPGRADE the one server we have? or just play on PC where there is no freezing ever? :0

Less players in fort? What do you mean? Rofl. Can you see the 100+ 1k guilds on Classic?

Hmm, if IP doesn't work, then check accounts linking? If this noob account is linked to the account that was killed, again, kills won't add. Maybe add IP tracker to each server? Not just 1 IP tracker managing all servers?

:l I know what I'm doing is probably useless and will not be added to the game, but better then not trying :l

Upgrade the one server we have? How so?

Not all have a PC. Just because you have a PC doesn't mean everyone else can get it. :l

Posted by Crono

Oh man, how have we never thought of this?!?!?!?!??!?!?!!?!!

Stoppp sarcasm isn't needed right now ):  

switch to pc. making the switch to pc at 4k wins was the best decision I ever made  

Posted by OG

switch to pc. making the switch to pc at 4k wins was the best decision I ever made

Posted by Wolfie

Not all have a PC. Just because you have a PC doesn't mean everyone else can get it. :l

...  

Posted by Droid

The multiple server idea is good to reduce lag. But it would definitely cripple gameplay. For example:

• Towering would have less competition, people would go on a server which has not many on / low guild holding tower
• Boosting would be made easier as there wouldn't be enough staff to police all servers at once, nor would Classic be in a position to employ more.
• Sparring would be less active, because people would join another server to streak. This again leaves door open to boosters.
• What if events were held on the server you weren't on? People complain about the weighted queue system now, but a slim chance is better than no chance right?

I can go on and on.

Hmm... that's funny. I remember the exact same things happened on the "Facebook" "Server." And it was shut down. So Wolfie, don't bother arguing with Droid.  

Posted by twilit

Hmm... that's funny. I remember the exact same things happened on the "Facebook" "Server." And it was shut down. So Wolfie, don't bother arguing with Droid.

Guess not :l