Posted by Thallen

I don't see how it's any better or worse than masses of players having "2009 player *SIGH* Graal was so much better back then" in their status?

im 08. hue. npulse is bae  

Posted by Thallen

I don't see how it's any better or worse than masses of players having "2009 player *SIGH* Graal was so much better back then" in their status?

Because it just creates more division between "veterans" who joined in 2010 and "noobs" who joined any time after 2012.  

Posted by Common Sense

Because it just creates more division between "veterans" who joined in 2010 and "noobs" who joined any time after 2012.

Why donyou care so much if theyre lying or not? It doesnt effect anything in the game if theyre being truthful or not.  

You guys.... don't miss the point here. There IS a time stamp. They've told us so. Now we angle towards "Birthday Presents!"

Come on!!

(This thread... I just don't know.)  

Posted by 4-Lom

You guys.... don't miss the point here. There IS a time stamp. They've told us so. Now we angle towards "Birthday Presents!"

Come on!!

(This thread... I just don't know.)

Why not just enter your birthday and have it based off of that. I'd prefer that. Only conceivable problem I can see with that is that everyone's birthday will probably end up being the day that feature is added.

Unless there was no bday rewards added at first, and then after a month or so of the birthday feature, presents are added.  

Posted by MrSimons

Why not just enter your birthday and have it based off of that. I'd prefer that. Only conceivable problem I can see with that is that everyone's birthday will probably end up being the day that feature is added.

Unless there was no bday rewards added at first, and then after a month or so of the birthday feature, presents are added.

xD too true to be true.  

Posted by Common Sense

Because it just creates more division between "veterans" who joined in 2010 and "noobs" who joined any time after 2012.

Sure, but you opposed the idea because it's "unnecessary"

Not saying if I do or don't support it, but by that logic then there's no need for online time, gender, or flag to be displayed either  

Posted by Common Sense

Because it just creates more division between "veterans" who joined in 2010 and "noobs" who joined any time after 2012.

So you mean people that played 200hrs in 2009 and came back at 2015 are better then people that played from 2011-2015 without any big break?  

I played like 2001-2005..? Then came back... 2012?

Better, no. Wiser, often.  

Graal used to be about how long you spent on a particular server, not how long you've been playing the game. I think this is still valid because most will go off hours ingame.

Posted by deadowl

Could it include linking to PC Graal accounts?

I hope so. WTS account September 2000!  

Posted by Goddess

im 08. hue. npulse is bae

NP 4ndy should visit this forum.

I like the idea.  

I don't mind if it is shown or not, because does it really matter?  

just do this  

Posted by Thallen

just do this

wow!! you started 2012? omg such pro, much oldbie..
(sarcasm, i know its not you.)  

Posted by Crono

Graal used to be about how long you spent on a particular server, not how long you've been playing the game. I think this is still valid because most will go off hours ingame.

I find it weird that guilds have more hours towering than Silvercrank had hours idling.

I hope so. WTS account September 2000!

Your account would be older than probably half of the players. Meanwhile, I wouldn't mind if someone added PC Classic hours to iClassic hours because then I'd be able to access all of those places that require 1k-2k hours.