Has Era surpassed Classic? - 3

rorriM · 08-10-2014

Because era's is increasing. It will surpass classic's player count, and that is a pro because it shows a level of success, and a con because of lag/spam/etc.

MrSimons · 08-10-2014

Posted by rorriM

Because era's is increasing. It will surpass classic's player count, and that is a pro because it shows a level of success, and a con because of lag/spam/etc.

Classic's is increasing too?.. I understood why it was a pro and a con, but if you are going to say "high player count" as a pro or con for something, it should probably be for the server with the higher player count, not the server you think might one day have a higher player count.

Rufus · 08-10-2014

Both could use a lot of work.

rorriM · 08-10-2014

Posted by MrSimons

Classic's is increasing too?.. I understood why it was a pro and a con, but if you are going to say "high player count" as a pro or con for something, it should probably be for the server with the higher player count, not the server you think might one day have a higher player count.

You cannot legitimately argue that era won't have a higher player count, and right now classic's technically isn't bigger, as they hover around the same count.

Nyx · 08-10-2014

There's always place for improvements, both servers are really great and fun in my opinion. This thread is just like the Xbox vs Playstation war haha.

iHot · 08-10-2014

Posted by rorriM

You cannot legitimately argue that era won't have a higher player count, and right now classic's technically isn't bigger, as they hover around the same count.

The numbers say otherwise lol

MrSimons · 08-10-2014

Posted by rorriM

You cannot legitimately argue that era won't have a higher player count

Until you present me with some sort of evidence that era's average playercount is rising at a faster rate than classic's, and enough to exceed classic's within the next few months, then I really don't see how you can argue that era will surpass classic. And keep in mind the thread title is "Has Era surpassed Classic", so this discussion is pointless anyway.

Posted by rorriM

and right now classic's technically isn't bigger, as they hover around the same count.

Classics average, and max playercount is higher than era's, yes it is "technically bigger".

kenthefruit · 08-10-2014

Posted by Nyx

There's always place for improvements, both servers are really great and fun in my opinion. This thread is just like the Xbox vs Playstation war haha.

i guess zone is the wii

Sloth · 08-10-2014

Posted by MrSimons

Until you present me with some sort of evidence that era's average playercount is rising at a faster rate than classic's, and enough to exceed classic's within the next few months, then I really don't see how you can argue that era will surpass classic.

.

So can I try and create a chart or something to show that this is true?

GOAT · 08-10-2014

From a player counts perspective: I say classic has a slight edge

From a in-game quality perspective: matter of opinion

from a making money perspective: i think era might make more money for ownership than classic.

From an importance perspective: I think classic is going to keep that title for a while.

Godoco · 08-10-2014

Posted by Rufus

Both could use a lot of work.

^^^

Cookie Xanadu · 08-10-2014

Posted by Summertime Love

Every since the launch of Era, EUROCENTER's second installment of the GraalOnline game series, Era's population per day has been increasing while Classic's been growing as well, but growing at a much slower rate.
My question is: Has Era surpassed Classic by popularity(and quality?)
Edit:I'm not flamebaiting guys ;~; I genuinely love both games equally and keep it cute

Second, huh?

You uh, you keep on thinking that buddy. I won't stop you :^))))))))))

iHot · 08-10-2014

Posted by Cookie Xanadu

Second, huh?

You uh, you keep on thinking that buddy. I won't stop you :^))))))))))

I think she/he meant mobile.

Posted by kenovo

i guess zone is the wii

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I mean sure Wii U sales may not be great as of now and I can pick up an original Wii for like $50 but that doesn't mean much.

Kendama · 08-10-2014

Posted by iHot

I think she/he meant mobile.

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I mean sure Wii U sales may not be great as of now and I can pick up an original Wii for like $50 but that doesn't mean much.

Pretty sure eurocenter had like all these other apps on the app store before era

Craftz · 08-10-2014

Posted by kenovo

i guess zone is the wii

Didn't the wii sell more than the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3?

08-10-2014	31
rorriM iEra GANI Team Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 175	Because era's is increasing. It will surpass classic's player count, and that is a pro because it shows a level of success, and a con because of lag/spam/etc.

08-10-2014	33
Rufus Registered rufp4 Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 3,378	Both could use a lot of work.

08-10-2014	35
Nyx Registered User Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 248	There's always place for improvements, both servers are really great and fun in my opinion. This thread is just like the Xbox vs Playstation war haha.

08-10-2014	40
GOAT Hyrule Knights Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: In your head 24/7 Posts: 6,348	From a player counts perspective: I say classic has a slight edge From a in-game quality perspective: matter of opinion from a making money perspective: i think era might make more money for ownership than classic. From an importance perspective: I think classic is going to keep that title for a while.