Unfortunatly you will need to get used to this 2 year cycle crap. Since unfortunatly, the only people who give a damn about game quaility is nintendo. Once again, video game industrys only give a damn about shareholders, not the players. If something like this works, you better beleve they will stick to the plan since studies have been done and the most popular game sales are the ones that are the same base mechanics and are the same. Bottom line, cod is a cashcow game, theres not going to be inovative mind blowing gameplay changes. Leave that for another title to take the place of cod and that become the new imdustry standered.  

Posted by Ghettoicedtea

For some reason, i have a suspicion that theres going to be a lawsuit since i think its ubisoft who already made a shooter called advanced warfighter. And being this is murica and you can sue for anything, i wouldnt be surprised if this was bought to court because of the word advanced. I doubt it will happen though.

Here's an example of why that won't happen:

Battlefield: Modern Combat - release date: [ps2]: OCT 24, 2005, [xbox360]: MAR 30, 2006

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare - release date: [360 & ps3] NOV 5, 2007  

Basically what theyre doing for this CoD is recycling old content/ideas and taking some from Titanfall. Ignorant gamers who dont know what a good game is will buy this for sure. In mu opinion, those of you wanting the franchise to end and all that are the people who know what makes a good game. I didnt get CoD ghosts and when I played it at friends house I was relieved to know that I dodnt waste 60$. CoD ghosts is just another recycled piece of *** with no originality, same old graphics, same old perks, killstreaks, etc

The saddest part about CoD gamers today is that most of them havent even touched the first 5 games of the franchise.

What you guys should be making a thread about is Battlefront. If BF has multiplayer (Im sure it will if EA is smart) it will be 2x better than any CoD game.

Posted by Jester Lapse

I don't think people realize if CoD ended, things like Titanfall and Battlefield would not exist. They would not try to get better in order to dethrone CoD as the lead FPS and in turn, all those other FPS' you like and enjoy would be leagues behind seeing as they would have no one to compete with. Even if you don't like CoD, saying it needs to end is only beneficial if you don't like FPS' at all

Why would EA stop making their shooter games if CoD ended? If CoD ended it would give EA a huge playerbase to sell to and mke even more money...


Also if you dont agree with what I said about CoD 'recycling content and ideas, try playing some of the older CoDs and then watch the trailer for Advanced Warfare  

if CoD ended oh holy **** battlefield would turn into the next CoD  

Posted by Talon

CoD will never have a single-player focus, and there are much better shooter games if you're looking for solid campaigns.

Just saying, statistics show only about 30% or so players worldwide play multiplayer cod.

However, Sledgehammer is focusing on the competitive side of multiplayer. That's a big risk to take considering the bad blood between casual and competitive players.

Just gonna say this too, if there's anything I could change about multiplayer, I would lower the damage guns do, increase movement speed while ADS (If people wan't a run'n'gun it should at least be a little more based on skill rather than who can shoot first and faster), and remove that CS ripoff Search and Destroy and replacing it with something more original and better suited for competitive play.  

FU SnD is awesome.  

Posted by Lazerlatte

Just saying, statistics show only about 30% or so players worldwide play multiplayer cod.

Source please.  

Posted by Rotaruc

Why would EA stop making their shooter games if CoD ended? If CoD ended it would give EA a huge playerbase to sell to and mke even more money...

You should probably re-read what I said and then ask yourself where I said they would stop making battlefield.  

Why do people keep saying CoD needs to end? Just because you don't find it enjoyable anymore doesn't mean other people don't enjoy playing it. And they shouldn't have to stop making games because a few people got bored of playing them.  

Posted by Talon

Source please.

Dunno about what Latte said, but about 40% of people do finish the campaign according to the raptr achievement stats. So, it's pretty considerable.  

Posted by Imprint

Dunno about what Latte said, but about 40% of people do finish the campaign according to the raptr achievement stats. So, it's pretty considerable.

Talking about this:

Just saying, statistics show only about 30% or so players worldwide play multiplayer cod.

I'm sure 40% of people complete the campaign, a lot of people play campaign on this. The claim that 70% of people that own CoD don't play multiplayer is what I'm calling bull**** on.  

Posted by Talon

Source please.

Drift0r. And he is the guy who knows what he's doing when it comes to raw data, soooo...  

Posted by Lazerlatte

Drift0r. And he is the guy who knows what he's doing when it comes to raw data, soooo...

30% of players sounds completely wrong. That's what most people buy the game for.  

that sounds good to me, all the people that I know buy cod for the campaigns really.  

Posted by Ghettoicedtea

that sounds good to me, all the people that I know buy cod for the campaigns really.

is this a joke