Guild spar new scoring

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-12-2014

I think guild spar scores should be relevant to 1v1 sparring

it's easy to get past 64. On guild spar and is way to easy to get into a gst :/ that way people will have to earn their way to the top. More people trying to get to gst rather than recruit 4 good sparers and get to top 10 within like 15 spars without a loss. When you lose, it's much different, you lose a small portion of you're points so that you can't have like 5k guild spar points and always enter a gst. If you win a guild spar you get 10 points if you lose you deduct 5 points. Points never reset, they just get deducted if you lose. The more you win in guild spar the more points will be deducted so that it seems a bit fair.

what's you're ideas?

Oj Fowler · 04-12-2014

Doesn't points lost scale with total point like the old single spar system?

Sicx · 04-12-2014

or just a wins over loses that resets each month

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-12-2014

Posted by Sicx

or just a wins over loses that resets each month

That's what I was thinking instead of losing points it resets

, but you only gain a small amount of points which is 10 so to make it difficult you lose! Many pro guilds will get a lot of points, they might as well gs 2 weeks before gst

Livid · 04-13-2014

Most losses category in BA library, just saying.

twilit · 04-13-2014

I actually thought about this before and do think its appropriate. All the "pro guilds" that make a couple big wins last minute before GST would actually have to get off their asses and practice some to keep their top spots.

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-13-2014

Posted by twilit

I actually thought about this before and do think its appropriate. All the "pro guilds" that make a couple big wins last minute before GST would actually have to get off their asses and practice some to keep their top spots.

EXACTLY

Winter · 04-13-2014

Makes sense. It would stop the spontaneous rise of numerous freshly made guilds from occupying the top of the charts where actual dedicated teams have worked to be. This is my point of view being that my guild is around 1200-80 W/L and some guilds are far above us after 5-1. Also, I was leader of the first (according to my memory, years ago) guild to reach 9000 after 10-0 or so.. So I've been in both positions and can justify this.

Plus, I'd just really like to see actual active guilds be recognized and praised accordingly, because I think they deserve it. Not a fan of 835928057 small, short-lived guilds with ridiculous scores and the same 6 or 7 members.

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-13-2014

Posted by Winter

Makes sense. It would stop the spontaneous rise of numerous freshly made guilds from occupying the top of the charts where actual dedicated teams have worked to be. This is my point of view being that my guild is around 1200-80 W/L and some guilds are far above us after 5-1. Also, I was leader of the first (according to my memory, years ago) guild to reach 9000 after 10-0 or so.. So I've been in both positions and can justify this.

Plus, I'd just really like to see actual active guilds be recognized and praised accordingly, because I think they deserve it. Not a fan of 835928057 small, short-lived guilds with ridiculous scores and the same 6 or 7 members.

thanks for feedback! Hope dusty or any scripters come across this and also consider it a good idea!

Oj Fowler · 04-13-2014

Implement a system like old 1v1 spar where you had to do so many spars before your score is recognised would eliminate these guild with ridiculous scores after 5 spars.

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-13-2014

Posted by Oj Fowler

Implement a system like old 1v1 spar where you had to do so many spars before your score is recognised would eliminate these guild with ridiculous scores after 5 spars.

many guilds want to be #1 so it will be difficult to pass them, people want to have a very high score. Therefore it's not going to get easy if this becomes an improvement. After 1-3 weeks you'll probably need 2000 points to get on the lead board and you get 10 points per win so it's not going to be easy at all.

GOAT · 04-14-2014

good idea with reasoning behind it but I say it would disadvantage the player/guilds that dont have the time to stack up wins. A GST championship is pointless if the best possible teams are not allowed to join the tournament. I know its a guild spar tourney but it shouldnt be only for dedicated sparring guilds.

Thallen · 04-17-2014

Posted by twilit

"pro guilds" ... would actually have to get off their asses and practice

Oj Fowler · 04-20-2014

This system doesn't reward gs ability, why would people want to dedicate all of their graal time to gsing?

Kyle Del. M. H. · 04-21-2014

Posted by Oj Fowler

This system doesn't reward gs ability, why would people want to dedicate all of their graal time to gsing?

Don't they dedicate their gs time already? Maybe the top 10 highest guilds get a emote or some sort of prize relevant to gst?

04-12-2014	1
Kyle Del. M. H. Registered User Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: BTK Posts: 500	Guild spar new scoring I think guild spar scores should be relevant to 1v1 sparring it's easy to get past 64. On guild spar and is way to easy to get into a gst :/ that way people will have to earn their way to the top. More people trying to get to gst rather than recruit 4 good sparers and get to top 10 within like 15 spars without a loss. When you lose, it's much different, you lose a small portion of you're points so that you can't have like 5k guild spar points and always enter a gst. If you win a guild spar you get 10 points if you lose you deduct 5 points. Points never reset, they just get deducted if you lose. The more you win in guild spar the more points will be deducted so that it seems a bit fair. what's you're ideas?

04-12-2014	2
Oj Fowler Registered User Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 22	Doesn't points lost scale with total point like the old single spar system?

04-12-2014	3
Sicx Registered Sarcastic User Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: ⓝⓞ Posts: 1,015	or just a wins over loses that resets each month

04-13-2014	5
Livid all for victory Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Townsville Posts: 4,222	Most losses category in BA library, just saying.

04-13-2014	6
twilit michael Join Date: May 2012 Location: Hyrule Posts: 3,511	I actually thought about this before and do think its appropriate. All the "pro guilds" that make a couple big wins last minute before GST would actually have to get off their asses and practice some to keep their top spots.

04-13-2014	8
Winter & Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: napping Posts: 1,381	Makes sense. It would stop the spontaneous rise of numerous freshly made guilds from occupying the top of the charts where actual dedicated teams have worked to be. This is my point of view being that my guild is around 1200-80 W/L and some guilds are far above us after 5-1. Also, I was leader of the first (according to my memory, years ago) guild to reach 9000 after 10-0 or so.. So I've been in both positions and can justify this. Plus, I'd just really like to see actual active guilds be recognized and praised accordingly, because I think they deserve it. Not a fan of 835928057 small, short-lived guilds with ridiculous scores and the same 6 or 7 members.

04-14-2014	12
GOAT Hyrule Knights Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: In your head 24/7 Posts: 6,348	good idea with reasoning behind it but I say it would disadvantage the player/guilds that dont have the time to stack up wins. A GST championship is pointless if the best possible teams are not allowed to join the tournament. I know its a guild spar tourney but it shouldnt be only for dedicated sparring guilds.

04-20-2014	14
Oj Fowler Registered User Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 22	This system doesn't reward gs ability, why would people want to dedicate all of their graal time to gsing?