![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 
			12-03-2011
			
			
		  | 
		31 | 
|  
			
			 Love to all 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Canada 
				 
				
				Posts: 1,406
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	|
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		32 | 
|  
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				
				 
				
				Posts: 13
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I am in the top 50 baby :3
				    | 
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		33 | 
|  
			
			 Love to all 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Canada 
				 
				
				Posts: 1,406
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	|
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		34 | 
|  
			
			 Dark Desert Fox 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: United States, Ohio 
				 
				
				Posts: 5,720
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 It's a useless system. They need a W-L ratio instead. People use second accounts to boost in the top 50, lose to a noob and you drop a lot (the noob could be someones second account), and the fact that people obsess over it instead of their record. Wouldn't it make sense to have a system where it's not easy for people to boost or have other accounts? W-L ratio will show the top 50 people who have the most wins over losses.
				    | 
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		35 | |
|  
			
			 Love to all 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Canada 
				 
				
				Posts: 1,406
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
  | 
|
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		36 | |
|  
			
			 Dark Desert Fox 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: United States, Ohio 
				 
				
				Posts: 5,720
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
  | 
|
| 
			
			 
			12-04-2011
			
			
		  | 
		37 | 
|  
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				
				 
				
				Posts: 13
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I actually don't think we should get rid of it altogether, I just hate the current system.  I think the win loss ratio system Tyler suggested would be splendid.  That way a sparrer's overall prowess could be rated.  Much less capricious, as well, no more losing "1000" points in one bad day and looking like a noob.
				    | 
| 
			
			 
			12-05-2011
			
			
		  | 
		38 | 
|  
			
			 amateur gay 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Australia 
				 
				
				Posts: 3,372
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 It's a lot easier to boost wins than to boost score imo.
				    | 
| 
			
			 
			12-05-2011
			
			
		  | 
		39 | 
|  
			
			 Dark Desert Fox 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: United States, Ohio 
				 
				
				Posts: 5,720
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Score is much simpler to boost. Get a brand new account and have someone let you win who has a pretty decent score of 6800 or higher and you'll be on the top scores in seconds. Wins take time and have a higher risk of getting caught because of the system they have where if you beat the same person a certain amount of times in a row they come check it out. Also, that would take a long time to do.
				    | 
| 
			
			 
			12-05-2011
			
			
		  | 
		40 | 
|  
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				
				 
				
				Posts: 963
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	|
| 
			
			 
			12-06-2011
			
			
		  | 
		41 | |
|  
			
			 amateur gay 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Australia 
				 
				
				Posts: 3,372
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
 Also, it would be just as easy to get on top of the W-L ratio leaderboard unless they had some requirement, like 100 wins or something.  | 
|
| 
			
			 
			12-06-2011
			
			
		  | 
		42 | |
|  
			
			 Dark Desert Fox 
			
			
Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: United States, Ohio 
				 
				
				Posts: 5,720
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
  | 
|