![]() |
02-22-2013
|
19 |
GunsAdmin
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,337
|
You guys arent getting this x-x, less ammo, and more fire rate isnt evening it out, its making it op, if you personally think stens better, buy sten. If you gave it a higher fire rate and less ammo, youd pretty much have a 60k souizen, and then sten users would complain. The gun is more of a 50k gun. It was made 60k because it has the ability of the different camos. Additions make the prices higher, same reason the thompsons 84k because of its case. Bottom line is its fine right now, ive seen plenty of ab8 users beat stens, you just have to practise with it |
02-22-2013
|
20 | |
Im serial!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Al Gore¨s Mind
Posts: 170
|
Besides AB8 wasnt made to beat Sten,if Sten is better well that makes it a unique gun,i personally think AB8 is better than M4. But if you have the urge to beat a 10k-20k sparrer that spams the sh1t out the Sten... then just buy or use the Sten. |
|
02-22-2013
|
21 | |
don't call it a comeback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,268
|
There are two cars, equally priced at $50,000. Car A has 500 horsepower, while Car B has 435 horsepower. Why would one buy Car B when Car A offers superior specs for the same price? The only thing that Car B has over Car A a custom paint job (that you have to pay for l0l) and insignificantly better brakes. The point is, there is no reason to buy the AB8 when there is a superior version of it available for the same price - the Sten. It's superior in every way to the AB8 minus eight bullets in the clip, a very insignificant advantage considering the reload time of the Sten (almost none). Equally priced products are supposed to be statistically equal with tradeoffs, like so (stats are fabricated for example purpose): PHP Code:
That took way too much effort to outline a basic principle of logic. |
|