This could be implemented into iClassic but at the same time there would have to be MAJOR restrictions and hefty editing made to this so as you mentioned it couldnt be abused.

Either way I like the idea, I hate when I see someone being an asshole and staff do ****-all about it.

Posted by MrSimons

That's not a problem, I believe that is what graal calls "strategy".

God I hope you're being sarcastic.  

Posted by Andre'

God I hope you're being sarcastic.

Spoiler

The whole post is sarcastic.

 

Posted by Brick

Spoiler

The whole post is sarcastic.

Don't listen to this guy, he's just a staff member trying to shoot down the idea. The whole post is legit.  

Posted by MrSimons

I think that allowing the playerbase to make more game changing decisions is one of the best things Graal could do. A good way to start doing this would be implementing a way to "vote to ban a player".

Essentially what this does is adds a little "ban button" at the bottom of everyone's profile, something like this:
http://gyazo.com/84d65aee4c4652f4686ac8124247a3c2.png (Unsupported image host)
This button will then bring them to a menu with to options, asking "Do you want to ban this player". Selecting yes will begin a timed poll lasting 2 hours, and if the votes are in favor of the player being banned at the end of two hours, the player is banned. If the only vote was from the person who started the poll, they will still get banned, because obviously no one liked them enough to say they shouldn't be banned.

This would be one small step in the right direction for classic. With allowing players to vote to ban other players, it will give everyone the idea that the players are the ones who really should make the decision, and that the staff have no idea what the hell they are doing. This will push classic into an age of Democracy and Free Speech, where we are allowed to vote for other things too, like who should be hired as an admin/moderator, or whether multipass is a pro. to bring back honor points and the part of deadwood that was removed; Things like that, things that were important to us players that staff couldn't understand.

Obviously staff are going to respond to this saying that this is a bad idea, or other rubbish like that. But it is just because they are afraid of strong empowered players like you and me. Together we can ban innocent people who we don't like if you just fight for it.

Reported  

Posted by Multipas*

Reported

L0L  

Add a system that allows you to "bump" a report to make them seem urgent, for example a hacker is in streak room, if multiple people report consistently, this will be top of the pile. This would also eliminate hate reports that mean nothing.  

Posted by Droid

Add a system that allows you to "bump" a report to make them seem urgent, for example a hacker is in streak room, if multiple people report consistently, this will be top of the pile. This would also eliminate hate reports that mean nothing.

stupid idea  

Posted by Droid

Add a system that allows you to "bump" a report to make them seem urgent, for example a hacker is in streak room, if multiple people report consistently, this will be top of the pile. This would also eliminate hate reports that mean nothing.

You realize how many people would use "bump" against someone that called them a nub?

URGENTURGENTURGENT  

Golden.  

The news just updated. It was added  

Posted by Pride.

What happend if all graalians vote for ban Xor ?

It will probably be like blocking system saying like you cannot ban this player, email bluhbluhbluh if you have an issue