If people want to suggest something, try to make it where it would realistically benefit the whole community and not a small percentage.
|
LOL!
This is exactly what I'm talking about in my previous post. "Come up with an idea that benefits players who will not be good at it just as much as players who will be good at it."
I know this is going to hit a soft spot, but any and every idea that encourages activity and competition on Graal will narrowly benefit a small percentage. That small percentage is the players who are actually good at the game. You know, the people who should benefit? Because it's an online game? And people who are good at the game should excel?
Apply this same logic to the GST. Let's stop holding the GST because it fails to "benefit the whole community" and instead rewards a "small percentage." We should probably shut down towering and events, too. It's not fair that the people who are good at towers get rewarded for being good at towers!
I think this is the same reason why there will never be support for a singles tournament. No one can come up with a reasonable explanation as to how it negatively affects the game, but 90% of people don't support it. The reason is because they'd hate to see someone else win it.
Those same people won't make their own suggestions to help improve the game, and if they do then I guarantee it'd revolve around the idea of limitations or restrictions on people. "You can only win this many hats." "You can only be this good." "You can only PK here." "You can only spar these people."
|
^^^^^