I think that instead of a ban sometimes, the admin the caught the player doing something against the rules should go to court with the player with NYN or Az as the judge. This would be enertaining because people could watch.  

It'd be entertaining but time consuming and I highly doubt admins would be willing to give up there time for this, plus there person probably wouldnt defend there case they'd just ask for hats and other items, plus this'll just make players disobey the rules just to talk/meet admins.  

Tbh I don't want every player's fate resting in the hands of NYN or Azrael. In an already corrupt staff team, this wouldn't help.  

They don't have time to be doing that kind of thing. To me it sounds like a waste of time since the people would put up a poor case or jut screw around. You'd have to do that for every person who was caught breaking the rules too.  

Posted by TylerMysTe

They don't have time to be doing that kind of thing. Yo me it sounds like a waste of time since the people woulc put up a poor case or jut screw around. You'd have to do that for every person who was caught breaking the rules too.

And thats quite alot of people.  

You would get lots of people shouting at NYN and azreal saying stuff like "CAN I BE A ADMIN" and stuff like that. It would be good though.  

I would rather be banned then have to deal with az and nyn at the same time. They would make you do something horrible or be like :'is that arguing? 6382010191 hour ban!'  

like mr froggy said it just wouldnt work  

Yeah. I'm totally corrupt, right?

Also, this definitely won't be happening. That would take up way too much time. Fun idea though.  

Posted by Azrael

Yeah. I'm totally corrupt, right?

Also, this definitely won't be happening. That would take up way too much time. Fun idea though.

Perhaps it could be a player thing... Such as a random pm would be sent to a online player adking if they'd like to be judge as long ad they are unbiased with a yes or no reply. No, sends to another online player. It could just be roleplay and no actual sentence given. Just an idea.

Or, players can go there and press a button that adds them to a list of players who would like to roleplay a courtcase, and when (randomly) a case is given, each online player who said theyd like to participate recieve a pm. And it randomly selects who is judge, jury, prosecutor, the accused etc from those who said yes to the pm.
In theory, it could work. But myself not being a scripter i cant say for sure. Wouldd be fun though.  

Posted by Black Shadow

Perhaps it could be a player thing... Such as a random pm would be sent to a online player adking if they'd like to be judge as long ad they are unbiased with a yes or no reply. No, sends to another online player. It could just be roleplay and no actual sentence given. Just an idea.

Or, players can go there and press a button that adds them to a list of players who would like to roleplay a courtcase, and when (randomly) a case is given, each online player who said theyd like to participate recieve a pm. And it randomly selects who is judge, jury, prosecutor, the accused etc from those who said yes to the pm.
In theory, it could work. But myself not being a scripter i cant say for sure. Wouldd be fun though.

This could be done without any messages or scripting at all. If players were 'sentenced' in this manner and actually received some sort of ban, that wouldn't be a good thing. Players already think that we're biased when we ban someone for being racist or lewd. We don't need players rebelling on players as well.  

Posted by Azrael

This could be done without any messages or scripting at all. If players were 'sentenced' in this manner and actually received some sort of ban, that wouldn't be a good thing. Players already think that we're biased when we ban someone for being racist or lewd. We don't need players rebelling on players as well.

I did say 'no sentance actually given'. Meaning no actual ban. Only i the extreme cases that arent 'for fun' as i suggested; they are made up accusations not actual accusations. I.e. Player A assassinated The President. Jus roleplay no actual bans given or anything.  

This has been done before and ended in failure..  

They won't waste their time on that, lol.
But you could always add NPC that is loking like them and the only thing it say is like "He is guilty"  

Unless you hired special staff for it...
too time consuming.
Though i admit there are lots of stupid bans on classic that need justification like the recent "altering files" problem.