So, the tier system has been added, jk. But, here is a video showing how it could work. Doesn't have to be chat commands, could just be in-game menu icons to find matches from anywhere on the map, instantly.

You can't selective spar, because you won't know who the server would match you based on similar skill level. Losses would be removed. I sort of explained this in another thread, but I over did it, so hopefully this will make it simpler?

Add prizes and people will use this a lot. Someone posted about protecting nubs, they would spar against players with similar skill level, and not be overwhelmed.

Q & A

Do you fight people only on your tier?
No you can fight a tier lower/higher and gain less/more points.

Can you boost?
No, if you lose, you lose points. You can't choose opponents. If you win enough you rank up.

Why remove losses?
So people won't feel scared to spar anyone. Ratios are pointless, Tiers is what's up.

Can you stay at the top of leaderboard?
No, you lose points when you don't spar for a certain amount of time.

What's the point of this?
Fun and competition + INSTANT MATCHES, NO MORE WAITING 3-5 MINS.

What do you get out of participating?
Hopefully prizes. Bronze gets a few gralats just for participating(50g) daily. Silver(100g) daily. Gold(1000) weekly. Diamond(5k) monthly. Legendary(10k) monthly. God-Like(Hat ticket/2nd/3rd place hat)  

DISCLAIMER: I was made to lose in this production! I care too much about my ego to leave that out!

However, I'll repeat my statements on the concept of this idea. I think that this is a well thought out system, but I don't think it's really needed for the spar community. I'll leave my thoughts at that so as to not start another war.  

Question : would this system actually penalise people for loosing ? I mean otherwise you can just spam matches until you find someone who isn't that good to rank up , I'm assuming if you reach a rank such as legendary then you will be put up agains people of that tier ... What if your the first to reach that rank then you have no one to spar ( if not put agains same people as your rank then the whole system just seems too easy )  

Posted by Natso

Question : would this system actually penalise people for loosing ? I mean otherwise you can just spam matches until you find someone who isn't that good to rank up , I'm assuming if you reach a rank such as legendary then you will be put up agains people of that tier ... What if your the first to reach that rank then you have no one to spar ( if not put agains same people as your rank then the whole system just seems too easy )

Obviously... It said his rank was lowered at the end.  

id rather remake the arena itself, the walltiles are so old, pls dusty  

Posted by Elk

id rather remake the arena itself, the walltiles are so old, pls dusty

Or maybe another arena itself but you need a certain amount of spars to enter it.  

Posted by Livid

Or maybe another arena itself but you need a certain amount of spars to enter it.

No, too much congestion, Instant matches = Instant fun.  

Posted by Hikaru

No, too much congestion, Instant matches = Instant fun.

Ah I guess your right, I'm just missing the actual second battle arena in swamp lol.  

Posted by Livid

Ah I guess your right, I'm just missing the actual second battle arena in swamp lol.

Ah okay I get what you mean, I was thinking of recording in snow, or sards, as a change of scenery, but was too lazy to set it up with auto-lock. But it would be cool if with matchmaking, admins could add different arena tiles.

Grass, Water, Sand, Snow, Lava.  

Posted by Hikaru

Ah okay I get what you mean, I was thinking of recording in snow, or sards, as a change of scenery, but was too lazy to set it up with auto-lock. But it would be cool if with matchmaking, admins could add different arena tiles.

Grass, Water, Sand, Snow, Lava.

You mean like in Unholy Nation where they have 4 sets of spar styles you have to abide by along with the Grass, water, sand, snow, or lava tilesets? Because that would be pretty cool aswell.
TerrainWars is what comes to mind to me  

It'd be a good way to see who is truly underrated in the legendary catagory, E.g thallen, ares, brett, tego and then an underdog like droid or me  

We all wish this was in game.  

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DlIJxAls7Dg/Uyh4WEM0UnI/AAAAAAAABwc/FBRe_aWGezA/s1600/i+know+you+want+it+dance.gif (Unsupported image host)  

dislike how you're trying to push losses being removed, only reason one would want this is to completely purge selective sparrers. i like seeing losses and my ratio sucks. we've been showing losses since sparring was first introduced and there was never a problem with this until the small amount of losers (who we all know are not actually good!!!) started targeting negatives.  

Why should losses be removed?

They cause people to not want to spar, because they don't want to mess anything up, instead of just having fun. I personally don't care about my losses.

Ratios are pointless, on UN they didn't have ratios as the official spar stats.

If you keep losses, people might not want to spar others with similar skill.

Losses demotivate, people who start sparring shouldn't focus on losses, but rather their wins. They won't think about their losses, because only their tier would matter.

Wins will show how much you have sparred, making some people veterans.