03-31-2016
|
151 |
Victor
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Guam
Posts: 728
|
"Mika won't series me on his main account, maybe an alt" Wat [YOUTUBE]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjNVHMh7p80[/YOUTUBE] |
03-31-2016
|
153 |
Alumni
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 21
|
Tbh personally i don't even think i should be ranked on this list, i choose not to spar 1vs1 on my PC because a lot of people say i lag/delay. if i did start sparing seriously on my PC (1vs1) i think i'd be a lot better then i am right now, people really have only seen me spar on iDev for fun and to be ranked in what is (Tier 2) is great and all but some people on this forum take these sort of things to the heart. If you have seen me guild sparing you would see the difference skill wise because i guild spar on PC.
|
03-31-2016
|
155 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 934
|
The top 3 are hard to rank, imo thallen's the hardest to beat, i'm like 0-30-5 against him. Trusand, "yey im gold." Why can't people just accept the ranking they received like trusand. 15+ people helped make the list, therefore it is not biased. It is very accurate, although ranking in order is tough because its very opinionated. Mex should be plat. Qes is lucky to be plat. He doesn't hold impressive streaks and his gst performance with dot is a good indicator of his skill Yo zetetic what type of external hard-drive do u have lol... cuz u kinda record everything u do on graal everyday. Im no tech genius but thats alotta gb's. Would i find zets how 2join slx on his utub channel? |
03-31-2016
|
156 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 264
|
As for the list itself, seems pretty accurate, not gonna comment on most because I don't wanna insult people.. I'm surprised I'm as high as plat but if people think that then I won't complain. Also Zid and Jack Mercy should definitely be legendary imo. |
|
03-31-2016
|
159 | |
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
Stuff like:
Not all of them relate purely to skill, but it'd be nice to see stuff like that when you click on "Spar W/L" in someone's profile. All of them are really easy to record. With something like that, I'm sure there's some sort of algorithm that can measure who the overall best is by taking average opponent ratio, average hearts won by, etc. |
|
03-31-2016
|
160 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 888
|
|
|
03-31-2016
|
161 |
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
I don't know, because first on that list is "average opponent W/L ratio," and what I mean by that is if you spar a 100-300, a 500-1000, and a 100-100, it's going to show you as sparring a 0.6 ratio on average and then everyone is going to laugh at you Average opponent W/L ratio would be a good multiplier in any equation to determine how good someone is, same thing as PPS like what Mikva/Zetectic posted If someone has an 8.2 spar ratio, a 1.5 opponent ratio, and they average winning by 1.2 hearts, there's probably a formula you can come up with to get their average Aguzo Performance Ranking... or something I'm sure people would still boost or spar selectively to get some of those stats up though, but there's no cure for cancer Anyway, these threads are probably more interesting than undeniable proof |
03-31-2016
|
162 |
Dr. Professor Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: I’m always located somewhere
Posts: 1,205
|
I would also like Average Spar Time. That would be an interesting indicator of how agressively someone spars. That shoudnt be added to the score in any way/shape/form. more just an interesting measure.
|
03-31-2016
|
163 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 888
|
Maybe also a pts/per win average for each person too... |
|