11-10-2012
|
24 | |
Not Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 4,885
|
This isn't a project that I believe could be completed within 80 years.. |
|
11-10-2012
|
27 | |
:pluffy:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,944
|
i'd rather see the western world (no point in waiting for the ****pits of earth) advance rapidly, esp when it comes to infusing technology with everyday stuff. i know london is aiming to replace their street lamps with ones that can be controlled w/ tablets/phones (iPad atm) which will save them around 300-400k GBP a year. nifty crap like this is taking way too long to trickle down. |
|
11-10-2012
|
28 |
Not Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 4,885
|
Well yes but london isn't in space, yes you will lose matter, but not in large ammounts, and with systems to bring in space debris you could gain new matter. As long as the hull remains sealed there is no way for matter to leave the system
|
11-10-2012
|
30 | |
:pluffy:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,944
|
matter will need to leave the system anyway, not everything is reusable. =[ the london point was a tiny example of a bigger and more important point, which is that we need to advance ourselves as a society first before we try to tackle a space city. |
|