![]() |
|
|
| Poll Results: What do you think about the Banning system? | |||
| 32.50% |
It is fine.
|
||
| 22.50% |
Needs slight improvement.
|
||
| 12.50% |
Needs more improvement.
|
||
| 42.50% |
It needs to be redone.
|
||
| 35.00% |
The server just needs a better policing team.
|
||
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Topic Tools |
|
05-04-2012
|
31 | ||
|
Feare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: On the Earth
Posts: 360
|
|
||
|
05-04-2012
|
32 | |
|
:)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: no.
Posts: 10,309
|
![]() Any way bans really screwed up, I have a friend with a jail broken device who was about to buy a gralat pack so he could get some stuff, then bam! Banned for a month for having an in app cracker. I think that's the biggest problem with bans right now, that shouldn't even be a ban. Instead a message should've popped up saying he can't buy gralats with in app crackers. Also year long bans should be removed, as well as any ban over 6 months because after 6 months of a ban your not coming back, bans should either be a lot shorter or turn into permanent bans if the time would exceed 6 months. I also believe ban times should correlate with the reason, not the offense or staff member. Because recently bans haven't been making much sense to me, one month bans for swearing, what is this club penguin? Swearing is a one day ban, At the most, not only that but year bans for bug abuse? Bug abuse is three day to a week ban, and so what if they have committed multiple offenses, it should take quite awhile to get to a year long ban if your just abusing bugs. Another problem is ban times vary depending on the staff who bans you, some staff are really lenient, and some are really harsh. I believe there should be some sort of rubric for staff for when they ban people so that Player A doesn't get banned twice as long as Player B just because a Staff Member1 caught him. |
|
|
05-04-2012
|
33 |
|
Hello loves <3
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Greece
Posts: 212
|
agreed
|
|
05-04-2012
|
34 | |
|
Era Scum
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,264
|
|
|
|
05-04-2012
|
35 |
|
Hello loves <3
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Greece
Posts: 212
|
era news correct me if i am false but i think classic has much more bans from era since i have played era and i see no discussion on this subject and none of my friends have been banned ! if what you say is true it should be changed
|
|
05-04-2012
|
36 | |||
|
Era Scum
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,264
|
|
|||
|
05-04-2012
|
37 |
|
Canavi.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 201
|
I like the ban system feels good to ban people In my opinion. Being banned for a long time usually means multiple offences which is usually stated in the ban.
|
|
05-05-2012
|
38 |
|
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
Unfortunate if you're banned unfairly, otherwise the system works.
|
|
05-05-2012
|
39 |
|
Quack Quack~
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,810
|
Yeah but for those Jailed, they needed to be online within the 8 hour span (Yup. It wasn't reduced while you're offline). In the ban system, i think you cannot touch it for a long time and just get back on it when times up. Hell, they might have set an alarm on their ipods/iphones and went to play different apps in the meantime during the ban system |
|
05-05-2012
|
40 | |
|
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
|
|
|
05-05-2012
|
41 | |
|
amidoinitrite?
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,484
|
|
|
|
05-05-2012
|
42 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Hampshire, United States
Posts: 3,135
|
I voted for each option because it let me. >__>
|
|
05-06-2012
|
43 | |
|
don't call it a comeback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,268
|
|
|
|
05-06-2012
|
44 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 471
|
Since there are so many post I will put my feedback in. (Still not regarding those two who were banned.)
If they were to put in how many severe words they used, added 5 or so hours per word, or actually have an equation to calculate the ban time I believe the system could be better. Then it wouldn't matter on the GP's judgement to ban a person for the time that they want, depending on what they think and if they are friends. Since friendship and popularity was part of the previous conversations they talked about on facebook.
Then judgement wouldn't even have to be made if there was a previous attempt, since it would just add on time depending on their reason history variables. Lets say you have harassed someone client.jail.harassment++; Time is added to your harassment variable and nothing else. Being jailed for harassment could only check for how many times they have harassed. And there should be one separate for sexual harassment. (A longer time) Going from a few minutes, or a few days all the way up to 1-2 years so suddenly.. There really is no logic behind it except that a person wasn't known or liked... So I believe there could be a jailing/banning system created. (And it would seriously only take a day or two). Also, a message to all of their friends notifying them via PM that they were banned for "such and such" and how long would be pretty good too. Not only would it let them know why they haven't been on, but it would deter them from doing the same, or let them know how their friend acts. Do they want to be friends with someone who sexually harasses people? Would the person who did it like losing friends due to his own actions? Would he not try to change his actions? |
|||
|
05-06-2012
|
45 |
|
User Registered
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,626
|
The jail times and the OLD bans were much more consistent than the current ban system. The first or second times for an offense would usually land you the same jail time, after that each time you did it again your time increased an hour. The old ip bans would be like 3 day, week, and a month I can't remember for sure. I remember getting jailed for 30 minutes for vulgar language, so someone getting a months ban for swearing is pretty extreme. |