![]() |
11-30-2011
|
32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 329
|
King of the hill is just one big game of cat and mouse. The attackers run around and hide while the defenders look for them and try to kill them, but fail because all the attackers do is run around this is exactly why people are saying it takes no skills anyone can run around and hide and anyone saying before all u did was spam your sword at the flag you obviously hardly take forts cause theres more to it then that you got the people trying to kill you aswell you have to move around and try not to get hit and die while trying to lower the flag i think before KOTH took more skills then now.
|
11-30-2011
|
39 | |
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
Edit: In this thread, 10 people are in favour of KotH. On Graal, there's at least 10 guilds who are opposed to it. |
|
12-01-2011
|
40 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 329
|
Graals dying theres not even 2,985 people left on graal be realistic and the way its going can you really afford to loss anymore? Then swap to facebook server |
|
12-01-2011
|
41 |
Love to all
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,406
|
It's new, it's different, it's in the testing phase. Don't speak for everyone when you say you don't like it. When i first heard of it i thought it would be appeasing to quantity over quality, but i was wrong. The fact that you get warped out when you die shows that it's more about staying alive and keeping the opposing guild's members from piling in the room. I really enjoy it and i think it gives tower taking a new outlook. As a compromise they should simply keep it on the towers currently using this idea, leaving both types of tower taking in use.
|
12-01-2011
|
42 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 329
|
|
|