![]() |
10-28-2015
|
362 |
~David M.
Join Date: May 2013
Location: At the gym
Posts: 416
|
I like the event. As for the amount of graphics, I'd say let more people work on it. For example Coco would tell some people 'make a gooey witch hat' the image (and final hat) they have in their head will often be so different you could use both. What Thallen said about people prefering quantity in these events, I agree. People will see a few hats they want, but when they get an uglier hat they won't be mad, they'll think 'ah well it is still a hat.' And keep trying to get the hat they really like.
|
10-28-2015
|
363 |
of Orange
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 826
|
Basically. Either: 1.) Throw old hats into the mix or 2.) Make new, quality hats One is harder and more "honorable" than the other but I guarantee you that nobody will complain if you do either. Till then you will continue to get **** over not releasing enough content for us. |
10-28-2015
|
364 | |
Should be fixed.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,359
|
|
|
10-28-2015
|
365 | |
PigParty🐷
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PigPen
Posts: 2,913
|
|
|
10-28-2015
|
367 | ||
iClassic Dev
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Onnet Town
Posts: 1,945
|
Making a few new things every year for the event isn't that big of a deal. It's when everyone expects unrealistic quantities and are disappointed when they get most of the prizes on the first day after whining about how they haven't gotten all the prizes yet not even half a day after the event was released. It's ridiculous.
|
||
10-28-2015
|
368 |
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
Why weren't the hats from previous years included this year then? Hey, there wasn't in 2013 where you guys used a bunch of hats that were pretty low quality compared to these! If there was, then I don't remember it. Maybe you and Dusty should do the Richaard's/Onett hats then tell the rest of the GFX team to open their buttholes and poop out as much as they can. |
10-28-2015
|
369 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
Don't take the following in a hard way. No... you didn't know, you don't always know, and if you did, you could have done something about it. Do you play the game? Have you tried to catch butterflies recently? They are hard to catch, due to the amount of players on. If somehow you did, why would you even bother with the ghosts? If something will obviously go wrong, why would you even release it?
Even this event could have been fixed with just simply allowing players to know what they could win. I'll post example pictures later on. |
|
10-28-2015
|
372 | |
Should be fixed.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,359
|
If ghosts were the ONLY thing you could get candy from you'd have a point, but it's not. It's one of three ways, and we intended to have more(including the candy bowls). We can't magically have NPCs not lag and everything on the server is an npc. Everything goes through the server before it gets to you, and the server is laggy. Therefor everything is laggy. We can't just not use the server because all it does is introduce loopholes for memory hackers. Again, feel free to post your amazing, well-thought out ideas and fixes to all these problems you know the answers to. PS. There was a lot of demand for ghosts to be brought back. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
10-28-2015
|
374 | |
Earning Unix dem stacks
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: In a fox hole somewhere
Posts: 7,391
|
![]() |
|