![]() |
|
08-05-2012
|
16 |
|
God
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: England
Posts: 1,043
|
No to body armour.
|
|
08-05-2012
|
17 | |
|
iEra's n00blet
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 81
|
Armor: 5 HP added - 2.5k 10HP added - 5k 15 HP added - 7.5k so on.. But good idea. |
|
|
08-05-2012
|
18 |
|
Pixels for breakfast!
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida, United States
Posts: 2,409
|
I think the concept is all wrong. I've been seeing that chances of features working is the best way to go. For body armor I was thinking that you could have a 35% or 40% chance of receiving 1/2 or 1/3 damage for every bullet you get hit with. And maybe have a rare percentage(like 20% chance) that you receive 1 damage. As we all know, a real bullet proof vest would make the game unfair. However I think damage reducing armor is better. |
|
08-05-2012
|
19 | |
|
zzz
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: WA USA
Posts: 9,232
|
|
|
|
08-05-2012
|
20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Egypt
Posts: 2,939
|
Body armor would just ruin the game in so many ways..
|