![]() |
|
06-16-2012
|
16 |
|
don't call it a comeback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,268
|
I still don't see why you conclude that Serene and Inspired were 'TaKaii offsprings'. I really hope you realize that Inspired was Fireenn's guild FAR before they recently started going for towers again. Serene is just another one of Vlad's guilds like Recon/Trill/etc. Sure there are a couple TaKaii members in both guilds, but it isn't like TaKaii cut in half and made separate guilds.
|
|
06-16-2012
|
17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 217
|
Solution: limit the number of 1K hats a person can get.
|
|
06-16-2012
|
18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 64
|
I don't really see a problem with a hat chasers. What are you trying to say about them? Do they make a terrible vision from making great known guilds with great achievements or...?
|
|
06-16-2012
|
19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 83
|
|
|
06-16-2012
|
20 |
|
&
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: napping
Posts: 1,381
|
Why not just find a set date to stop giving hats for 1000 hours? Players get no hats for number of spars, PKs, or hours. Guilds get no hat for having a score of 10000 or higher in spars. Why should hundreds of people be continuously rewarded for holding towers? I doubt many guilds really wanted to be a successful or popular guild.. Most guilds just want another hat, and use members from other guilds to get there. Why do they get rewarded? Most of them have achieved this accomplishment 3 or 4 times already! |
|
06-16-2012
|
21 | |
|
:)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: no.
Posts: 10,309
|
|
|
|
06-16-2012
|
22 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 217
|
Admins can set a flag (similar to a cookie in an Internet browser) that indicates the person already got a 1K hat. Very easy.
|
|
|
06-16-2012
|
23 | |
|
RiCE KiNGS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 385
|
We've had 50 guilds hit 1k, we should just stop it now and let every guild that hasn't decided on a 1k hat yet, get theirs then be done with 1k hats.
|
|
|
06-16-2012
|
24 | |
|
&
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: napping
Posts: 1,381
|
|
|
|
06-17-2012
|
25 |
|
michael
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 3,511
|
|
|
06-17-2012
|
26 |
|
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
You have a sixth digit, we should listen to him.
|
|
06-17-2012
|
27 |
|
don't call it a comeback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,268
|
Tower threads should just be banned from the site. It's the same sh** on a different thread, on an unofficial site. It will accomplish nothing, you guys arguing like this. It gives me a headache seeing a new tower-bitching thread popping up every other post. Honestly, I'm just sick of it. Out of all the things to complain about in Graal, you go full-scale about towers. Not inequality or favoritism with staff guilds, not outrageous prices (well, not as much), not ridiculous personal graphic limitations, but towers. One thing in the game that will never change. There's seriously five damn threads in this subforum about towers. "Solutions to tower dominance", "New guild and tower system", "Alliance", "Fixing the towers", and "Proposal for Tower System" - the only towering thread that should still be active, because it is well thought-out and reasonable, as opposed to the other four aforementioned threads. The other threads are just blind hatred and bitching of how towers are unfair. Frankly, the staff don't care. Nothing will change. |
|
06-17-2012
|
28 |
|
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
Staff favouritism can't be helped, prices aren't a problem and the limitations on personal uploads are perfectly fine. I agree with you, four of those threads should be closed and there are way too many, but something has to be changed.
|
|
06-17-2012
|
29 |
|
michael
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 3,511
|
*whistles and pumps fist in air* WOOOOOOOOOOO! GO AGONY!
|
|
06-17-2012
|
30 | |
|
Delteria Manager
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,474
|
|
|