|
|
|
| Poll Results: Consequence vs consequences? | |||
| 33.33% |
Increase value of items but spawn rate is bad?
|
||
| 66.67% |
Increase spawn rate but value is bad?
|
||
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Topic Tools |
|
07-21-2018
|
1 |
|
Rabbid
Join Date: May 2018
Location: North Korea
Posts: 17
|
Reverse role?
I noticed in classic that they were nice enough to increase the spawn rate but they decreased the cost, do you think this is fair or no. *Farming decreased by getting a 5 gralat but increased in 1 gralat *looting increased in spawn rate but decreased the cost of items *bug catching has more butterflies but the price is bad Is this good enough? |
|
07-21-2018
|
2 |
|
Registered Old Person
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Graal City Restaurant
Posts: 4,742
|
Oh you sweet summer child...
|
|
07-21-2018
|
3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 921
|
You have not seen the true winter winds
|
|
07-21-2018
|
4 |
|
Rabbid
Join Date: May 2018
Location: North Korea
Posts: 17
|
Actually yes I see green hairstreaks everywhere nowadays, for the past few years I get less bugs but now I get more thx to the increasing spawn rate of these "bugs" but I despise them being cheap.
|