Posted by Nanner

Shots fired

lol boss admin gonna fire you for commenting here

If i had to choose between a half eaten bag of cheetos and jimbo to fill the 5 spot, I'd take the cheetos tbh  

Posted by TeK

Yea that makes sense. It certainly could be an advantage, but doesn’t necessarily give you much higher of a chance of winning overall. The players you’d need to worry about would most likely still be just as difficult because they’re good enough to adapt against you as well. I understand what you’re getting at though

I think that would give me an advantage because spar isn’t consistent, good sparrers always lose to players they aren’t familiar with/have not sparred against, and the only thing I can think of to improve consistency is experience, and yes they can and probably do adapt to me but what I’m saying is they haven’t sparred enough to adapt to the other 48 players in the SST, where as I probably have  

Posted by alexx

I think that would give me an advantage because spar isn’t consistent, good sparrers always lose to players they aren’t familiar with/have not sparred against, and the only thing I can think of to improve consistency is experience, and yes they can and probably do adapt to me but what I’m saying is they haven’t sparred enough to adapt to the other 48 players in the SST, where as I probably have

Finally , Someone using basic logic of what I was saying when I said the 1st person holder would likely win since as you said they have more experience against the others, More familiar with them. And so on.
People think just because Kaios got 1st last season since not as many people got into the sparring season that was really good last season that it automatically negates any common logic, Despite I said it's a advantage or more likely since the experience and familiarity of sparring the others way more.  

Rusix, what you are trying to say has nothing to do with 'logic'. It is not at all logical to say 'the 1st on the board is most likely to win since he has the most experience'. The 1st one leads in exactly one category: Points. Against who has he/she gotten the points? Nobody will ever know that. Points measure activity and only if there were very many active classy sparrers fighting for the trophy (since then they'd actually fight each other), the meaning of points would get more close to representing skill.

I think what you try to express is that 'being in shape' is a huge factor when it comes to sparring. That is not the case because spar happens in the head. From a certain intensity of sparring on, you don't forget patterns and moves anymore. Please read my previous post in this thread, it will save you so much time  

Posted by Droon

Rusix, what you are trying to say has nothing to do with 'logic'. It is not at all logical to say 'the 1st on the board is most likely to win since he has the most experience'. The 1st one leads in exactly one category: Points. Against who has he/she gotten the points? Nobody will ever know that. Points measure activity and only if there were very many active classy sparrers fighting for the trophy (since then they'd actually fight each other), the meaning of points would get more close to representing skill.

I think what you try to express is that 'being in shape' is a huge factor when it comes to sparring. That is not the case because spar happens in the head. From a certain intensity of sparring on, you don't forget patterns and moves anymore. Please read my previous post in this thread, it will save you so much time

Tl;dr: activity =/= skill  

you guys are ******s it's not four pages of rocket science to understand the leaderboard format vs. a tournament format  

Posted by Jimbo

Nobody bragged you dumbass
But you were crying on forums about your loss, there is a difference

Honestly you can talk on forum but on the field you suck and you dont stand a chance

Excuse me if I’m wring but wasn’t it your team that accused thallens team of hacking because you lost 😂😭😂😭😂  

Posted by Rusix

I know, It would be fun, I'd love such, But leaderboards only go to 50... not 64, plus as I said before, it would be extremely likely the 1st place in seasonal spar will likely place 1st, they got more experience through the time, and also they probably fought everyone else enough to know how to beat them.. I mean, believe me I love the idea, But I think graal would need to be fixed in many areas to even have such possible

yo man wat u sayin, how can u mak a tournmnt with 50 player, it no evn a power of 2, u cnt mak an elimination tournmnt with a numbr not even power of 2 yo!
and wtf u sayin, u mean alexx is first of season so if there is one SST it win it? no no man it no true, everybody ez kangaroo yoo!!!!! nd for exampl me, im not in spar scoreboard, but i ez all top 50 yoo!!:! so if there is SST, i be win for sure! ur theory ****  

Posted by Fatih

yo man wat u sayin, how can u mak a tournmnt with 50 player, it no evn a power of 2, u cnt mak an elimination tournmnt with a numbr not even power of 2 yo!
and wtf u sayin, u mean alexx is first of season so if there is one SST it win it? no no man it no true, everybody ez kangaroo yoo!!!!! nd for exampl me, im not in spar scoreboard, but i ez all top 50 yoo!!:! so if there is SST, i be win for sure! ur theory ****

+1 , that's art.  

Posted by Sky VS

+1 , that's art.

no me  

Posted by Saber Alumba

Excuse me if I’m wring but wasn’t it your team that accused thallens team of hacking because you lost ����������

Correct... I’m pretty sure jumbo was also trying to explain how his teammate needed to disconnect 10x in order to stabilise her connection lmao

Whatever his mental disability is, it’s probably difficult to pronounce  

Surprised someone like deophite still cares about this game. It's very obvious that the admins could give less of a crap about this game. These people dont even receive payment if you think about it.

An SST will exist in the early 2020s in my opinion.

Posted by Rusix

I'd have to agree but also disagree, The leaderboard does show the most active sparrer, however in the same way it also shows they are likely the best at that given season.

The reason I say this is because simply they gained the most experience, they are the most sharp knife in the drawer. If you fought against a strong sparrer every day, you'll probably get better after a while, you will progress a bit if you are truly willing to accept a challenge and its outcome even if you lose.

But same time experience only can go so far. The General person themself can play a a role in just how they think and how they are able to deal with different situations and different kinds of sparrers.

It's kind of like if Sparrer A could beat Sparrer B with a pretty high chance, But Sparrer B can beat Sparrer C with a high chance, but Sparrer C can beat Sparrer A with a high chance.

So who is "Better" Sparrer A, or B, Or C?

In terms of the sparrer A, B or C, that's almost 100% invalid. We all have strong and weak points. So, that bs dont matter, it depends on the style of spar we are immune or weak to. Also I'll disagree with the leaderboards determining the best sparrers. Technically one can boost their way up. Only losers would but hey, nothing's impossible.
Examples: ndam, kaios, Ale Monster, Alpha, Boom/Frost, Flint, bananer
These are all people that have a high leaderboard score but suck pretty badly.  

Posted by Darkk

Correct... I’m pretty sure jumbo was also trying to explain how his teammate needed to disconnect 10x in order to stabilise her connection lmao

Whatever his mental disability is, it’s probably difficult to pronounce

Lmao get some sleep  

I would like a spar tournament. But I feel sparring is the only thing keeping this game on life support. We should focus on other things such as the new guild system, or bringing back ctf?  

damn everyone here is angry