Matches between Alumni and us have always had some type of unfairness, to only point fingers at us is unfair. It comes from both sides, we've had matches where we would get tons of lag hits from the alumni idev and no dq, and we took them and went on. Yes we played with banned members but we took that risk knowing we had a chance of being DQd, we did it just to be with friends, we never looked to win, just to have fun. Sarah clearly stated to the admins that we had banned members both times. We are great friends with all of the alumni idev, theres no need to fight over what happened. We''ve have a long history with them, moments where we both had technical difficulties, members freezing on their side a few times, people not showing up on our side, my phone crashing last gst etc. Sarah Abood Shaheen Pkun Sugar Mood Jack Alex are great sparrers and its all respect from VIS.  

Posted by ReD s.

she got tonnes of hits in that were unable to be prevented

She went from 2 to 0.5 when she unfroze: https://youtu.be/akrEMQY5ywM?t=157
Not to mention, she left her team 4 vs. 5 for the whole match. That's far from an advantage... Nobody wanted her to lag like that. They won that spar by way more hits than Sarah netted when she was spiking around.

Posted by Fro

Matches between Alumni and us have always had some type of unfairness, to only point fingers at us is unfair.

Using banned players and cheating is something you can choose to not do... A host choosing to not DQ a player is not something we can control. Sarah, Mood, and others have been DQed and/or warped out of the GST plenty of times. We even said in guild chat that Sarah should have been DQed, and we immediately subbed her.  

Posted by Fro

Matches between Alumni and us have always had some type of unfairness, to only point fingers at us is unfair. It comes from both sides, we've had matches where we would get tons of lag hits from the alumni idev and no dq, and we took them and went on. Yes we played with banned members but we took that risk knowing we had a chance of being DQd, we did it just to be with friends, we never looked to win, just to have fun. Sarah clearly stated to the admins that we had banned members both times. We are great friends with all of the alumni idev, theres no need to fight over what happened. We''ve have a long history with them, moments where we both had technical difficulties, members freezing on their side a few times, people not showing up on our side, my phone crashing last gst etc. Sarah Abood Shaheen Pkun Sugar Mood Jack Alex are great sparrers and its all respect from VIS.

hola amigo :3  

Posted by Zetectic

or u just slow af xddd took me only 2 hr to edit 3hrs of gst clips.

im busy noob plus ur videoz suk  

Posted by Alex R

Doesn't help when it's fuelled by the other attention seeking brown nosers on this game who have their heads lodged up your ass. Que saber~ ( ;)

Me and Sarah don't even get along in game about 90 % of the time if I'm honest so how is my head lodged up her ass ?
Also could you please edit this post so I can actually understand half the stuff your saying thanks.  

hola juanitooo, and nobody from alumni idev has ever been dqd against us (that I'm aware of). and I'm talking about lag hits not freezing, mood was removed for freezing. whenever we received lag hits there was never any dq. And yes that's true that we cant control whether an admin dqs someone and whether we decide to use a banned member but that's why we took that risk, we weren't gunna complain if we were or weren't dqd. The same way you guys take the risk of technical difficulties and dqs during gst.  

Posted by James205

im busy noob plus ur videoz suk

lel u startin' to sound liek colin .-.;;

Posted by ShinoGraal

I don't know who made that video, but the music was very obnoxious.

^^REKT  

Posted by Zetectic

lel u startin' to sound liek colin .-.;;



^^REKT

I gave him Miley Cyrus option though  

Posted by Fro

Matches between Alumni and us have always had some type of unfairness, to only point fingers at us is unfair. It comes from both sides, we've had matches where we would get tons of lag hits from the alumni idev and no dq, and we took them and went on. Yes we played with banned members but we took that risk knowing we had a chance of being DQd, we did it just to be with friends, we never looked to win, just to have fun. Sarah clearly stated to the admins that we had banned members both times. We are great friends with all of the alumni idev, theres no need to fight over what happened. We''ve have a long history with them, moments where we both had technical difficulties, members freezing on their side a few times, people not showing up on our side, my phone crashing last gst etc. Sarah Abood Shaheen Pkun Sugar Mood Jack Alex are great sparrers and its all respect from VIS.

i like how u think it is okay to evade bans and participate in gst. and also others - 'just don't get caught, that's all'

we did it just to be with friends, we never looked to win, just to have fun.

only the best of vis were allowed in the vis gst. vis leftovers had to form a 2nd team of their own. i am sure of this bc jose, roxas joined entity idev, marc's status b4 gst was- 'no gst or looking for gst' something like that. then they pulled themselves together last minute.  

its obviously not okay, but that statement is an assumption which is fine but I'm well aware its not okay. Like I said, I knew we had a large possibility of getting dq, we were fine with whatever the outcome was. So idk how you think that. and Yes that's pretty much how it is, we've tried balancing them out and it didn't work out. so we worked with our other members to help them prepare. Ive lost twice to my own team. Ik what theyre capable of and they will carry on for us. When we are done.

and I clearly said in the opening that both teams had a factor of unfairness, so idk what makes u think that I think its ok when I clearly said it was unfair  

so ur mindset is if we get caught, we will take the 'responsibility'. so it is okay to use banned players in the gst.?? you knew you're breaking the rules. on top of that, you didn't stop. you won gst. in the other hand, sarah didn't know she was gonna lag. she also subbed out??

yes, they were both unfair, but one is clearly on purpose, while the other isn't.  

my mind set is that imma just spar with people I enjoy sparring with, you need to stop making assumptions and acting like you know what I mean. I'm taking responsibility for my actions, and I always have from the get go. I never denied it or said it was ok. So you need to rethink your statements or just stop assuming and instead ask questions. ill gladly answer them for u.  

Zet u skyped with vis! You played agario with us... we played it together! You... You laughed! You are a bad man!  

The GSTs they cheated in were from a long time ago, not really worth talking about now... I brought it up because it looked like they were reaching for props about fairly beating Alumni, which they did do this season. COMMENCE WITH THREAD!  

And correct one is more intentional than the other, but I'm sure after it happening so many times on their side, they would learn from it, but they still take the risk.