![]() |
|
02-10-2012
|
1 |
|
dbi.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
|
Lag Cap Campaign
Graal Classic (iPhone Server) needs a lag cap in its spar. Lag has always been a problem on many servers not just Graal iClassic but since the new spar system was uploaded, it has became an increasingly bigger problem. Often people have been taking advantage with their 'lag' or 'delay' and getting spar streaks up to 30 or more wins and turning the spar leaderboard into shambles. To improve Graal Classic spar and to ensure a fairer game we need a lag cap around about 300ms. Many people would agree with me, that this has become a problem in Classic and the problem should be resolved as soon as possible. |
|
02-10-2012
|
2 |
|
User Registered
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,626
|
the mexican population in graal does not support this
|
|
02-11-2012
|
3 |
|
Not Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hell
Posts: 4,885
|
This needs to be added
|
|
02-11-2012
|
4 |
|
dbi.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
|
I don't know about you guys but i find it also a problem when my wifi spikes as im joining a spar, and i experience a messed up spar because of it. I would also find this beneficial in that sense too.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
5 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1,000
|
of course, i support this. dante (demon) just got #1 spot on our leaderboard by putting tinfoil on his router to produce lag. something must be done. quick.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
6 |
|
Mad Villain
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 711
|
I agree with this.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
7 |
|
Dark Desert Fox
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States, Ohio
Posts: 5,720
|
I would like to see a lag cap too. However, there are people who don't have good Wi-Fi and can't do anything about it. With this being said, I think they should have only one or two rooms with this cap so the people who have the router problems at times can spar in the rooms without lag caps.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
8 |
|
SixHundred&SixtySix
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: donuts
Posts: 311
|
:'''''( I guess I'll have to move to America then. |
|
02-11-2012
|
9 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 26
|
I completely agree with this lag cap idea. Probably half my losses are from either my own lag or someone else lagging.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
10 |
|
Zanza
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 426
|
I'll see what I can have one of our scripters do. I think the best solution would be to have a number of rooms that are Lag Capped and a number that aren't, so people with crappy routers can still participate. That'd have to measure into the scoreboards somehow though.
|
|
02-11-2012
|
11 |
|
maymay ambassador
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,508
|
A 300 ms lag cap is ridiculously tiny. Maybe they could just re-allocate the staff they had looking for off-map glitchers and moderate the spar leader board instead. Perhaps even reset boosters stats and ban them from participating in ranked spars. |
|
02-11-2012
|
12 |
|
Classic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New York City
Posts: 908
|
|
|
02-11-2012
|
13 |
|
SixHundred&SixtySix
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: donuts
Posts: 311
|
So if I enter a spar with say 110ms then half way through I get lag spikes what would happen?
|
|
02-11-2012
|
14 | |
|
User Registered
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,626
|
|
|
|
02-11-2012
|
15 |
|
amateur gay
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,372
|
300 is way too low, if you even considered that you're stupid as hell.
|