![]() |
11-13-2015
|
19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,204
|
These are extremists with extremist views but they have violated the law of the Quran and therefore no longer should be identified with it. Muslims are killed everyday by these extremists because even they do not stand for it I wish more people knew this because the stigma that Muslims are bad and should be feared is one that should not exist, a real Muslim would never bring harm to anyone. By identifying these people at Muslims, it is going to make people think that is really what Muslims are like and that is exactly why the stigma for them exists. |
|
11-13-2015
|
21 | |
donald trump'd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,438
|
@Sun, your president/prime (would've to look that up) is a huge moron. So is Charlie Hebdo (would've to look up that name, too). After the first attack, Charlie Hebdo was blamed, according to ISIS member. And yet it is okay for them to continue to publish bull**** which only pisses off people and is offensive? To have another attack? I'll buy myself a cookie if those attacks were done buy ISIS again, because of that reason or similar ones. Back to your prime, when the first attacks occured, what did he do? Pull all police into it, saying he wants the terrorist(s) caught, dead or alive. That's a death punishment. Even worse, the people weren't even proben guilty at that time the redneck told TV he wants them dead. Noone should be punished without being proven guilty (courts??), especially not by that redneck. But hey, you're French so probably what ever I say, I'll be wrong unless I agree on what you say. I apologize for any names spelt wrong, though. |
|
11-13-2015
|
22 |
Circus
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 2,090
|
What I meant was, France are doing a **** job at keeping a low profile (per say) against the extremists, however it's encouraging for them to challenge some of the beliefs of the extremists such as banning burkhas in public areas or the charlie hebdo comics (even though these were made by French people - not government). The Brits (government) wouldnt dare go against or upset the views of the extremists - if anything they would ban popular christian norms (such as wearing the Poppy flower in rememberance) if it meant the other religions didn't get upset. Despite this - I can see that its part of a bigger picture. Don't upset the enemy or the people of your country are more prone to being the next target I guess.. ![]() TL;DR France give extremists the middle finger in multiple ways, seems patriotic at the time Later people get killed for giving the middle finger - huge ****ing mistake by France (in general) But you can't blame France really, it's not the Gun that kills it's the person holding the gun Sorry if this sounds like a lot of bs to anyone reading this, im just tired and frustrated and trying to speak my mind |
11-13-2015
|
24 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California
Posts: 894
|
I apologize for the stereotypes (didn't mean them intentionally.) Just trying to learn |
|
11-14-2015
|
25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,204
|
They think they are, but they really aren't. They are just born into an environment where they grow up being brainwashed to think this because it's an easy way to get them to follow you, the true motivation is and always will be power. The teachings of the Quran do not teach anyone to kill for Allah, extremist people teach other people this to gain their support and following. I just dislike seeing Muslims being associated with this at all because millions of them live in places like United States and a lot of people have poor thinking and will think all of them are like this when they aren't which is why it is best to just not say it at all. If they were killing in the sake of Allah then they would not kill Muslims who believed in Allah like they do. |
11-14-2015
|
26 |
donald trump'd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,438
|
Kill people who believe in Allah and are Muslims and innocent, non-muslim people aswell, in the sake of Allah? I doubt, nope. There is no 'killing in sake of God" except if it is happening while a Jihad-scenario (not going into this, another topic) or death-penalities (because you killed INNOCENT people). Seems pretty fair to me, you take life of someone innocent - your life will be taken, must admit that even though I try to not support death penalities. |
11-14-2015
|
27 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California
Posts: 894
|
The government right now (even the world) is placing blame on 'Muslims' in general for this. I learned that Muslims are doing this to 'kill' for the sake of Allah on the radio and a little in the news. The government is attacking another religion again and brainwashing the public to stereotype and create a stigma that all Muslims are inherently bound to kill you for the sake of conversion. |
|