![]() |
09-21-2013
|
1 | ||||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 64
|
Guns Analysis (and Tier List)
This chart contains some details on gun stats ![]() - edit: Watermelon Gun costs 7500 not 6500
are most of the guns I currently own. The damage values of other guns can be found here: http://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21388
Last edited by Tunder; 09-21-2013 at 09:57 PM.
|
||||
09-21-2013
|
8 |
Freelance Developer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,111
|
You said that underpowered guns aren't balanced with higher class guns, so you don't see the balance. Just take a minute and think about that. Underpowered guns are balanced with other underpowered guns. If we made all guns completely fair with each other, it'd be redundant. High class guns are made to even out other high class guns, and low class guns are made to combat other low class guns. Most of zone's guns are taken from PC Zone, stats and all. They maintained a perfect balance there, perfected over the years the server was up. That balance is replicated on iZone in the guns released and those to come.
|
09-21-2013
|
9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 64
|
The Flower gun, Apple gun, and Watermelon gun are all priced 6500-7500, my suggested changes are meant to balance them relative to other guns in that price range. I'm thinking of Green Rifle, Red Rifle, and Poison Vine which are all 6000. Flower gun costs only 500 more than Green Rifle, yet it outclasses all existing guns in its price range because it kills in 1 less hit. Making it slightly slower wouldn't upset the balance -- it would make it equivalent to existing guns of its class and turn it from a blunt power upgrade to a power gain in exchange for speed. If anything this nerf would lead to less redundancy and open up more viable choices for players. The Apple Gun change is simply to make it viable with guns of its price range. I'm not asking for anything outrageous. It is plain underpowered given its attack rate and price. I don't see why you'd be opposed to a 1 damage buff. If it was a .5 damage buff, then it would take the same amount of hits to kill an enemy as it would now. What kind of buff is that? The Watermelon Gun costs 7,500 but performs worse than the LR Pulsar which costs 1,500. Yes, Watermelon has 8 damage and LR Pulsar has 4, but the LR Pulsar fires over twice as fast. And twice as much fire rate is way more effective than twice as much damage, because it takes multiple bullets to trap an opponent into a position where they are hit by just one. The Watermelon Gun fires so slow that anyone can just dodge the single Watermelon with ease. You're talking about maintaining of guns within their class, yet my three suggestions are simply to bring two guns up to the level guns cheaper than them perform, and to prevent one gun (Flower) from rendering others in its class obsolete by filling the same roll with simply more damage. Not sure why you're talking about maintaining the balance of original Zone guns... I didn't suggest changing them and believe they are mostly balanced right for their prices. Flower, Apple, and Watermelon were all added very recently. |
|
09-22-2013
|
12 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 64
|
Thanks you guys for the feedback! @Tashkin to see all the official stats would be amazing! I love the Plasma Shotgun change and although it hasn't been working for me in spar I think its definitely worth the 4k due to how unique it is and how fun it is to use. I have been using it a lot just to mix things up. I'm really excited for future gun updates and am so relieved to see old/obsolete guns like Plasma Shotgun getting reworked, especially in such cool ways. As long as the official fire rates/spreads/etc. are secret I'll update this thread with approximate stats as I buy new guns and test them out. |
09-22-2013
|
13 |
Freelance Developer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,111
|
The flower gun is the most expensive and consequentially the best in the tier that you've classed it in. Yet stats don't dictate actual performance. You say that the stats create a rift between the flower gun and the other guns in it's tier. How then do I (and I'm sure you too) witness other guns classed in that tier beat the flower gun in a fair matched battle? The flower gun gives more for it's price. But it's far from over-powered. On the other hand, note the watermelon and apple launchers are just that...launchers. They are meant to hit heavy punches with a slow firing rate. Speeding them up would defeat their purpose and theme. People often make the mistake of spamming their guns, rather than taking the right shots at the right time. These two launchers could easily crush other guns if used by players correctly. At the end of the day, the guns are more or less appropriate. And it comes down to how players use them. If you're armed with one of the launchers and expect to spam you're way through a fight, then you're not using your weapon properly and to their full potential. It would be a no-brainer that you'd be destroyed. But if you know your game and your weapon, everyone is fair. |
09-22-2013
|
15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 64
|
- If Apple Launcher is "meant to hit heavy punches", then why does it deal the exact same amount of damage as Flower Gun? It costs the same as Flower Gun, deals the same damage, but fires slower. Firing slower is not an advantage that Apple Gun has and Flower doesn't. A good player using Flower Gun will fire slow, selective shots when he/she needs to and then also take advantage of the faster fire rate when appropriate. Flower Gun is everything Apple Launcher is and more with no drawback at the same price. - Believe me I love the idea of the Watermelon Gun and Apple Launcher. I want viable guns that can compete with the faster ones while rewarding careful aim and timing. The problem is that the stats that went behind Watermelon/Apple that may have looked good on paper are not appropriate in game. I have used the Watermelon Gun more than I've seen anyone else use it and I've tried hard to find a tactic to take advantage of it. While I've gotten pretty good at "cop-out" shots and tricking players after a lot of work into getting hit by watermelons, in the end it is just not worth the effort. You say the launchers "could easily crush other guns if used by players correctly" -- by who exactly? Honestly after the amount I've tried with Watermelon I bet I have more evidence that it cannot than you have that it can. Take any two decent sparrers and give one the $7500 Watermelon Gun, and another the $1000 Metallic Rifle, and you'll find the Metallic user will almost always win. This is because of the reality behind fire rate in this game and the necessity of forcing opponents into situations where they slip up and take a hit after reacting to a group of shots. I am not trying to get two balanced guns buffed into an overpowered state, I am trying to get them to the point where people can REALISTICALLY use them and compete with existing viable guns within the same price range. - Honestly I think it's kind of rude to imply that the reason nobody uses Watermelon/Apple is that we just expect to "spam" with them, or that we just can't figure out how to utilize timing and aiming tactically enough. Do you really think players who have sparred and won thousands of games don't know about those factors? Why are you convinced I would simply make up these issues with gun balance? Have you used them competitively for hundreds of hours and know some secret method us regular players are just too incompetent to figure out? Instead of reading my three specific suggestions, you're blowing them off and dismissing my experience with the game and thats clear to me now after reading your responses. You've yet to explain why the plus one damage to Apple Launcher / Watermelon Gun would not make them more balanced guns... you're just describing and defending a theoretical gun concept that I agree with and want to be prevalent in this game. The concept of the guns is not the point, I'm talking about the actualization! It's annoying to me because I care about this game and genuinely want to help improve it. Suggestions by regular players shouldn't be taken as attacks on the judgment of the developers (which is what you seem to be treating it as, since you're simply defending the design concepts and not addressing specifics). How do the developers expect to nurture and expand the PvP elements of iZone if they aren't willing to listen to feedback from the people who use it most?
Last edited by Tunder; 09-22-2013 at 05:43 AM.
|
|