I doubt many of you know who "Jamie" is, but she's currently #3 on the PC Leaderboard. Now, I've had an argument with her since I knew well enough she doesn't spar on pc, nor is she good enough to go 100-10 for her to get 819-819 and to get #3. She claims herself that "eko" has sparred for her then claims that what happened isn't boosting. I'm not 100% sure on whether it would be classified as boosting or not, but I'm pretty sure it's at least boosting.  

Report her then in-game  

i'm #3 now BOOYAH

I helped teach Jamie how to spar a bit better. I think she's been improving and your math is incorrect. People often jump the gun on this topic... Although, nobody ever knows for sure. You can assume what you want until you catch her in the act.  

Posted by Winter

i'm #3 now BOOYAH

I helped teach Jamie how to spar a bit better. I think she's been improving and your math is incorrect. People often jump the gun on this topic... Although, nobody ever knows for sure. You can assume what you want until you catch her in the act.

Regardless, she doesn't spar on PC, nor did she spar for herself. She got someone else to spar for her just so she can get a 1:1 ratio.  

Hmm if you let someone on your account so they can soar on it that dose t really count as boosting , boosting is when you get a second account and let your self get free spars/kills from it ...  

Posted by Natso

Hmm if you let someone on your account so they can soar on it that dose t really count as boosting , boosting is when you get a second account and let your self get free spars/kills from it ...

The concept is still the same thing since she's not the one sparring for herself.  

Posted by Striken

The concept is still the same thing since she's not the one sparring for herself.

Not really cuz no one is allowing we to get free spar wins , even knowing the person is on her account but he still needs to legibly win the match to raise her spar rating , so basically he/ she still win the spar legibly with the skill they have therefore its bit boasting


Lets put it on a concept of a diff game

FIFA : if Some one comes around ou house or is on you account and wins a match for you it wouldn't be cheating would it ? Becouse Simone still had to achieve the win

Cod : if someone goes on your accound an raises your kd legibly it's not boosting , and by letting a player do this you also run the risk of them lowering your kd  

Posted by Natso

Not really cuz no one is allowing we to get free spar wins , even knowing the person is on her account but he still needs to legibly win the match to raise her spar rating , so basically he/ she still win the spar legibly with the skill they have therefore its bit boasting


Lets put it on a concept of a diff game

FIFA : if Some one comes around ou house or is on you account and wins a match for you it wouldn't be cheating would it ? Becouse Simone still had to achieve the win

Cod : if someone goes on your accound an raises your kd legibly it's not boosting , and by letting a player do this you also run the risk of them lowering your kd

Those concepts are bad. Take "League of Legends" for a better example. People pay pros to go on their accounts and play for them so they can get a better elo which is basically their ranked rating. The same case happened here except there was no payment and she got #3 on PC and didn't do the sparring. If you really can't understand this, don't post.  

Posted by Natso

Not really cuz no one is allowing we to get free spar wins , even knowing the person is on her account but he still needs to legibly win the match to raise her spar rating , so basically he/ she still win the spar legibly with the skill they have therefore its bit boasting


Lets put it on a concept of a diff game

FIFA : if Some one comes around ou house or is on you account and wins a match for you it wouldn't be cheating would it ? Becouse Simone still had to achieve the win

Cod : if someone goes on your accound an raises your kd legibly it's not boosting , and by letting a player do this you also run the risk of them lowering your kd

Then I would want to spar the guy who's winning/raising stats for you.  

Posted by Striken

I doubt many of you know who "Jamie" is, but she's currently #3 on the PC Leaderboard. Now, I've had an argument with her since I knew well enough she doesn't spar on pc, nor is she good enough to go 100-10 for her to get 819-819 and to get #3. She claims herself that "eko" has sparred for her then claims that what happened isn't boosting. I'm not 100% sure on whether it would be classified as boosting or not, but I'm pretty sure it's at least boosting.

You're just jelly.  

Posted by Dawnstar

Then I would want to spar the guy who's winning/raising stats for you.

Nothing stopping you  

Posted by Natso

Not really cuz no one is allowing we to get free spar wins , even knowing the person is on her account but he still needs to legibly win the match to raise her spar rating , so basically he/ she still win the spar legibly with the skill they have therefore its bit boasting


Lets put it on a concept of a diff game

FIFA : if Some one comes around ou house or is on you account and wins a match for you it wouldn't be cheating would it ? Becouse Simone still had to achieve the win

Cod : if someone goes on your accound an raises your kd legibly it's not boosting , and by letting a player do this you also run the risk of them lowering your kd

Then I can't give you credit for all of those games won. The guy who won the games for you will receive my respect.  

Posted by Tricxta

You're just jelly.

So you instantly assume I'm jealous that some girl gets her spar stats up from some guy who's thirsty for some graal booty? You must be cute, especially since you use the word 'jelly'. If you're really trying to insult me, you're gonna have to try a bit harder and use sophisticated words.  

Posted by The Troll

Then I can't give you credit for all of those games won. The guy who won the games for you will receive my respect.

That's one way of putting it , but you can't call it boosting can you  

Posted by Natso

That's one way of putting it , but you can't call it boosting can you

No. But it's boosting in a way without using the term boosting.