![]() |
|
Poll Results: Would you like new Guildhouses or even a "Villa" | |||
63.64% |
Yes! I'm looking forward to this!
|
||
27.27% |
No! I don't like this!
|
||
9.09% |
Yes! I'd like to make Levels for this and post them here!
|
||
9.09% |
I wouldn't Mind.
|
||
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll |
|
|
Topic Tools |
05-04-2013
|
5 | |||
Lsimhbiwfefmtalol
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Forum Games/Classic
Posts: 399
|
Like everyone else said, guild houses are for guilds. And having public houses balances it out between houses and guild houses. Before public houses, almost everyone used guild houses. Now, houses are getting a fair share of usage.
|
|||
05-06-2013
|
8 |
michael
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 3,511
|
why are you idiots so stubborn on the name of "guildhouse?" Originally "PLAYER houses" were meant to be private, but are now public. And guild houses are much larger to fit the PUBLIC. And besides even though guild houses were originally meant for guilds, a) you can invite non-guild members in anyway, b) the owner can disallow members access to the guildhouse. And besides, no one puts anything real fancy in their player houses, all i see are mazes and crap. Most people put more stuff in their guild house because its BIGGER. I have 500,000g worth of furniture in my guild house and no one else sees it. Basically: i paid 5 frickin dollars for my guild house so i should be able to make it public if i want. the rest of you can keep it private if you want |
05-06-2013
|
9 |
The Unwanted Critic
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,639
|
I don't like the idea of Villas, the issue with playerhouses is they seem to take up a lot of data on the server, remember when guild houses came out, and it caused chaos when the server storage filled up? I don't see a reason to make something in between, as it seems pointless. Making something larger seems epic, but Stefan would probably end up charging like $20 for it because he can and people would buy it. As for a larger selection of guild houses, I totally agree with this. Variety is great, and it overall is something that Classic has lacked variety of when there's 9000 hats and bodies and all that. I could probably make nice levels, but I doubt they would accept them-Xor really hates me, so he frowns upon anything I make. As for public guild houses, heck yes! I want to be able to throw a huge party and have tons of random people come over, and just mess around. I loved doing this years ago, but it got boring when you had to keep spamming out invites and getting new people. I'm thinking even have the option to have it listed as an open GH, which is sorted in order of how crowded it is. I think they should raise the player cap to 50 as well, up from 25. |
05-06-2013
|
11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,956
|
good points tho. I just see guild houses as a "club house" of sorts. They should be more private fancy places reserved for only members of your "elite club" - your guild. Playerhouses are houses for you, and whoever else - they're your personal home, so you can have any horny ten year olds standing around talking in all caps you want in it. |
|