I didnt mean literally plus i was eating with 1 hand so i thought if you were good enough you'd know what i said i meant Obama was the only President to have osama killed  

Posted by Bulldogg Lucero

I didnt mean literally plus i was eating with 1 hand so i thought if you were good enough you'd know what i said i meant Obama was the only President to have osama killed

Because there's only been one Osama Bin Laden .__.

Also Obama didn't kill him, seal team 6 did. Any other person could have given the order if they were in office and they just happen to get the intel that Obama was lucky enough to receive.  

Posted by NCJohn

Because there's only been one Osama Bin Laden .__.

Also Obama didn't kill him, seal team 6 did. Any other person could have given the order if they were in office and they just happen to get the intel that Obama was lucky enough to receive.

But Obama had the hard task of sitting in a chair watching the feed of the mission with a bunch of officials!  

Now that I think about it the bashing of Obama's use of drones in what we like to believe as "Pakistan" is just ridiculous. The northern area of pakistan that al Qaeda is located in is a free for all no mans land. Pakistan cannot even control it, nor does any government try to. So after al qaeda infamously declared they were behind 9/11, we requested to enter the area. Pakistan wanted us to invade them since they cannot control that area themselves, but they acted like us entering meant WE were the bad guys, because the public's mentality in the middle east is that all non believers are infedels and they did not want to upset their people.

Its as simple as that. So the public does not want us in their area (even though northern Pakistan by all means is not a country). So instead we use drones to do this because its better to kill a person than to send them to Guantanamo Bay and leave them in a rotten hell for life in prison. Since we are invading a free mans land with drones to seek out the criminals that killed 3000 people 10 years ago, we are the bad guys in international media. What logic, huh?  

I recently read a TIME magazine article that really opened my eyes.

It was a article about the presidential campaign. The writer quoted the republicans word for word and most of then believe that Obama sympathies with radical terrorists group.

The writer notes how ironic it is that Obama welcomes the group with drone attacks and special operations. This showed how desperate some politicians are that they cling to rumors and stereotypes about anything against their opponent.

Unless someone shows up as the next F.D.R...

:/  

Posted by Pimpsy G.

I'm not for either of them. Both Romney and Obama have their pro's and cons. I for one am hugely against healthcare. They are classifying it as a tax, but the very fact that I am forced to pay for healthcare straight out of college is ridiculous. Why in the world would I need to pay thousands of dollars per year for something that I'm statistically incredibly unlikely to use at that age? I should have the right to turn it down from my employments health care plan as it is not an economically sound option for me. That is the main reason I am against Obama, not to mention the whole drone strike thing he's gotten himself into. But hey, Romney just seems... mentally unstable to me. I don't know, just the way he handles himself just seems odd. That's besides the point, though. Even though the president has basically no grounds in controlling gay marriage since it is determined by the states, I don't like that hes against it. But I do like that he is against health care, that's something that I really, really do not want to be forced to pay for.

The idea behind having mass numbers of people purchase healthcare is so that the price will go down and become affordable for every citizen. The reason healthcare costs are so high are because insurance companies are gambling with each plan. If more people have health insurance there's less of a liability so prices should drop.

Posted by Pimpsy G.

That is literally the worst way to form a political opinion. The government should not be the one making life easier, the people should. The main problem with Obama is that his plan is to expand the government, when it should be shrinking since its overstepping its bounds way too much with all these government programs. Health care is designed to give assistance to people that cannot afford it, thats why so many poor people are for it. But the fact is that its more government regulation, more taxes, more food stamps, and more aid. We should not and will not as a country be lowered down to rely on the government to fix our problems, if you can't afford something, go back to school and get a better job. Don't sit around and rely on food stamps to supply things for you. My uncle does that and its sickening. He doesn't want to get a job because the government feeds him.

I don't see why people with less money then you should be denied healthcare because of their position in life? Also, for your information not everyone sits on their ass and waits for food stamps, not everyone has the time to go back to school or the money. While there are some people who do they are not the majority. Revoking access to government funded help won't aid anyone. If we want to reduce spending on food stamps you need to educate the population so that they aren't put in that position in the first place.

Posted by MattKan

No, it's Obama who wants to make things easier for the people who DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING AND WANT TO LIVE OFF OF THE TAX DOLLARS OF OTHER HARD WORKING PEOPLE. A lot of people are voting for him because that's them, and they don't want to work.

And yet $720,000,000 a day go to the iraq war.  

Posted by Higbey

I could not compete against a computer, thing is a computer wouldn't be any party, its deciscions and ideals would've the current state of the USA and the citizens, in fact, it could be set up so anyone with Internet or near a station could vote on anything. Like a poll for everything, it could show the opinions of each area, the age and gender of the voters, statistics, In fact, a supercomputer could be the most informed canidate.

And it could also make super robots to take over earth. If you ******s think computers is the way to go, good bye earth you lazy basterds.  

If I was American, I'd vote for Obama because Romney scares me.  

Neither, ron paul

Posted by V.

Excuse me for looking stupid, I'm not great with American politics, but who's Romney? Is he like the opposition for an election or something?

A stupid pomp ass rich millionare who doesnt care about america

Posted by Dimentio

Neither, Obama made empty promises...
And I don't really support Romney either.
It's all about the biggest liar.
I thought about Ron Paul, but I'm not sure about him either.

Atleast he read the constitution unlike romney

Posted by Bulldogg Lucero

Obama all the way, he's the only one to kill osama

Osamas not dead  

Posted by Imprint

I don't see why people with less money then you should be denied healthcare because of their position in life? Also, for your information not everyone sits on their ass and waits for food stamps, not everyone has the time to go back to school or the money. While there are some people who do they are not the majority. Revoking access to government funded help won't aid anyone. If we want to reduce spending on food stamps you need to educate the population so that they aren't put in that position in the first place.

Democracy is based on competition, and if we spend the money to help out people that, well, "loose" the competition then the whole point of competition and the market based economy flies out the window. Using that logic we should bail out every single car company, that seems to be Obama's logic considering how he treated GM. This is economics, not ethics. Sure, ethically what your saying is the right to do, but economically it will just continue to make more and more people rely on the government, more and more people sitting on their asses, and more and more debt. Same as feeding the starving children in africa, if you continue to feed them the population will continue to grow and exceed their area's natural support, thus creating more children next generation to starve, because they are relying on the people that are feeding them.  

Get this app:

 

Posted by spades of feare

Neither, ron paul



A stupid pomp ass rich millionare who doesnt care about america



Atleast he read the constitution unlike romney



Osamas not dead

You're an idiot.  

Posted by Pimpsy G.

Democracy is based on competition, and if we spend the money to help out people that, well, "loose" the competition then the whole point of competition and the market based economy flies out the window. Using that logic we should bail out every single car company, that seems to be Obama's logic considering how he treated GM. This is economics, not ethics. Sure, ethically what your saying is the right to do, but economically it will just continue to make more and more people rely on the government, more and more people sitting on their asses, and more and more debt. Same as feeding the starving children in africa, if you continue to feed them the population will continue to grow and exceed their area's natural support, thus creating more children next generation to starve, because they are relying on the people that are feeding them.

I never said that healthcare and food stamps should be tosse around to every bum with hunger pains. But, there are people who have lost their job or something else who need a crutch to get back ontheir feet. Also, you defined capitalism not democracy. Democracy is representation of the people.  

America to be honest is over the top with everything. Every single ****ing time you guys get into a fight, the English and other allies send in troops to. But all Americans can think about is themselves, your a country who won't agreed on anything and no wonder the world hates you. We didn't want to come into Iraq and Afganistan but nooo the Americans have to invade and **** everything up. Sort out your ****ing country....btw every other country pays for their health care so why can't you guys shut up and pay for yours. We struggle enough the euro declining and we pay for it, all your politics are corrupt, your media is corrupt...


/rant  

We didn't have to get in the war to help Britain, France, and Russia against Germany and the Austro-Hungarian empire, but we did anyway because it was in our best interest. If you haven't noticed, Great Britain and the U.S. have large ties with each other.

Also, Canada.