heeeeeeeeeey Bboy. how about, you, me, and a whole lotta spetsnaz.
sound good? you know my id, see you online. (;

you miss the entire POINT of Call of Duty.
The point is that it is a direct sequel, a straight pickup from RIGHT after Modern Warfare 2 left off. Trust me, the first mission as the S.A.S. will have you in Nikolai's helicopter. In the course of 2 days are all the weapons used back in those 2 days supposed to go defunct? no. And what exactly is better about battlefield, when all THEY add to their sequel is a little HUD Shake, a new campaign, 3 attachments to EACH gun, and hardly any variety in any multiplayer? yes, there are vehicles in BF, understood. But also remember that said vehicles are usually driven by a 10 year old masochist on a thirst for roadkill. And the jets? how are you going to use them when all the 5 year olds are crashing them into the bay? Modern Warfare 3 also houses different variety in their Gameplay, new attachments, always a new goal. BF lets you BUY this. So while you are aching for that Scar-L in 13 levels, some little child in Bulgaria has a sniper rifle and a whole lotta madness and he gets you across the map. In which in CoD, everyone is leveling up. The hackers aren't a problem if you have some skill.
Battlefield 3 is NOT a sequel to BF:Bad Company 2. It is a sequel to PS2 game Battlefield 2. So we might see some old techniques thrown in, such as the overpowered MGs. yes, i remember that.
Modern Warfare 3 is consistent. They find ways to make your expirience better without taking out anything you love. It's a level playing field for CoD. As opposed to battlefield 3, in which the playing field is up and down.

(oh, and we got a scottish dude with a beard, and someone with a mohawk working on the same team. you got 4 hairy dudes.)