Posted by spades of feare
For the story between games we have the novels, the one between halo 1 and 2 is called halo:first strike.
|
Im referring to as a game... Not a novel. That would be like if God of war 2 was a comic known as God of War 1.5 instead of a game and God of war 3 is named "God of War 2"
|
And how would you know there focus on which aspect when theres barely any completely offical information out. They have a team of close to 150 people total working on it so i think either way it will turn out amazing, the campaign will be focusing on how much more badass spartans are than they have been portrayed ex.
|
This completely proves my point that Halo 4's story is going to be utter garbage... But it may prove me wrong... who knows..
|
Vaulting, climing up shafts and other motions like dive rolls. And i believe halo has changed alot , all cod has gotten for the last 5 or6 years since cod 4 was a graphics update and a crap campaign.
|
>Implying cod only got a graphics update
-Killstreaks/Deathstreaks (varied and switched from COD4 to COD MW3)
-Nazi Zombies (COD World at War and COD Black Ops)
-Campaign sections (Tanks, Helicopters, Sleds, etc.)
-Perks (Varied and switch through the COD games)
-Survival (Also known as FireFight in Halo 3: ODST)
-MW3's class system (Specialist, Support, Attacker,etc.)
Where dafuq have you been?
And dear god... The campaign is fun but its short and repetitive at times if you play from COD4 to COD MW3. It still leaves a small grin on your face when theres some kind of fun mission.. Like the sleds
|
And i havent seen much milking, they seem to be doing alot of work very covertly which i love being supprised andnot knowing every detail, cant wait for E3 .... Im mad they didnt have a panel at PAX
|
http://forums.timegate.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2596&stc=1&d=1306963135 (Unsupported image host)
You are completely missing out the point here and acting like a whiny Call of Duty Fanboy would do...
Halo 3 was a conclusion to the Halo Trilogy..
It had a perfect and satisfying conclusion...
But no... You think its right to revive John-117 everytime you think the Master Chief deserves better...
Imagine if all of a sudden: Solid snake dies in a game by being shot in the head... And then in the next metal gear game, he wakes up with a shot in the chest and says he had his bulletproof vest on..
Assassin Creed has shown that its sequels could tell the story of other assassins and still maintain as a really good game..
In other words, why not have the story put in the shoes of a different spartan like in Halo 3 ODST and Halo Reach? Why do you have to revive John-117 and destroy such a perfect conclusion to the original Halo trilogy?
Also, please explain to me: What new threat is Master Chief going to fight? If its a virus that infects spartans and have them all against Master Chief: That'd be cool i guess... Idk..