|
Posted by Maikeru
Ok... Let me inform you that
Was not marketed as finishing the fight with the covenant... at all..
It was completely marketed as "Finish the fight".. It was informed that this was supposed to be the conclusion to the franchise and that Reach was a prequel and the last Halo game..
Literally, WTF happened to this?
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/108/1086915p1.html
And if i wanted a game to know more about Master Chief: They should've then made a game that doesn't involves destroying the conclusion of the franchise! Like a game before Halo 1 or between Halo 1 and 2 which tells the story of Master Chief..
But no... Halo 4 is made.. And 343 industries has been focusing more on the multiplayer aspect rather than the campaign aspect of the game. Its like they don't give two damns about the story mode and decide to continue milking the halo franchise because of the multiplayer that attracted hundreds to the xbox360..
And if you're comparing Call of Duty to Halo: Halo has been the same through all of its game but with additional content. Halo hasn't changed and so hasn't Call of Duty.. They're both the same thing... Except Call of Duty so far hasn't destroyed any conclusion to one of its games.. But if i see a Call of Duty: Modern warfare 4... I can highly agree with you that Call of Duty is nothing compared to Halo..
But for now, 343 industries is starting to milk the Halo Franchise.. and thats horrible... Especially for a game which had a very strong conclusion.. The ending in Halo 3 was actually good.. |
For the story between games we have the novels, the one between halo 1 and 2 is called halo:first strike. And how would you know there focus on which aspect when theres barely any completely offical information out. They have a team of close to 150 people total working on it so i think either way it will turn out amazing, the campaign will be focusing on how much more badass spartans are than they have been portrayed ex. Vaulting, climing up shafts and other motions like dive rolls. And i believe halo has changed alot , all cod has gotten for the last 5 or6 years since cod 4 was a graphics update and a crap campaign. And i havent seen much milking, they seem to be doing alot of work very covertly which i love being supprised andnot knowing every detail, cant wait for E3 .... Im mad they didnt have a panel at PAX.
|
Posted by Dusty
So? Goldeneye was remade too. Now the term mega-success is being used instead? I'm not DOWNPLAYING Halo, just saying that it wasn't the first successful console FPS. I don't understand why people are getting defensive about it.
|
Oh , my bad, yeah i will give you that. Sorry
