|
The argument is ridiculous..
Blame George bush for terrorism.
If he didn't order soldiers to kill saddam, nothing would've happened.
But yes, the population of Iraq itself wanted him dead, but Americans literally "took over" the country, which means they have control of the prisons, and guess what they did to prisoners, they literally took their dogs to like make the prisoners scared.
Prisoners were naked, and the dogs were like barking at them while the idiot ass Americans laugh off their ass.
Oh and also, they murdered some prisoners, tortured some.
And it was put a stop to it when a journalist exposed it all, when the Iraqi population found out what was going on, they built like rebels to execute the Americans for what they did.
See the point? If bush wasn't so greedy for oil, ISIS would probably not exist..
|
1. Terrorist organizations were a problem long before Bush was in office, and terrorism has never been an issue contained to Iraq anyway so I'm not sure how that's even relevant.
2. Most people misinterpret the oil situation so terribly. We aren't in the Middle East for oil and it doesn't take a whole lot of thought to realize why.
For starters the US produces a hell of a lot of oil on its own, we have massive reserves in Texas, Alaska, and the Gulf. And if you were to look at how much oil the US imports you'd see that we
import more oil from Canada than the next 3 nations combined (none of which are Iraq). Would it really make sense to invade a country on the other side of the world and topple their government for a resource that is hugely available on our own continent?