|
What if winning spar points were simply based on opponent's (Wins)-(losses)?
Let me tell you why this would be better than the current system.
1/ Currently there are so many players who just chase noobs in side rooms, with that system sparring noobs will mostly give you negative points. For example, if you spar a noob with 40-100 and win, it will give you -60 pts! So there won't be any reasons to spar noobs anymore.
2/ If you spar a booster with 10:1 ratio + very little wins, you win 100 pts easily
But if you spar a person like Thallen who is also 10:1 ratio + 40k+ wins, you win 100 pts aswell but the hard way.
I always thought this situation was unfair.
Wins-losses takes in consideration your wins which means your experience in spar AND it also takes in consideration your ratio so you will get the pts you deserve to get.
I'm aware that this wouldn't be fair for a person that is streaking since noobs are queueing but this could be solved by not allowing new playechangedtreak rooms it's only unfair for them they will only lose. They can spar people with the same level in side rooms until they get better.
I'm not asking to implant this, this is a suggestion. My suggestion might have flaws that I'm not seeing. PLEASE DO NOT DERAIL MY THREAD!
Credit: Thallen's duel discord bot gave me this idea.
|
Ya lol, Ive made 1st twice. Its all about the ratio which is a bit dumb. like I used to chase Ravage around in the side rooms. Was like 53points per win? All u have to do is hunt high ratios no matter if there a booster or what. I agree the point system should be changed. You have ravage a side roomer giving 53points per win while u have me fighting everybody in mixed and only give 22points? Which is sad