This is not accurate wording at all. We are under no obligation to develop the server and simply see no point in continuing so on what is clearly an un-supported platform, especially after the way our Facebook agreement was mis-handled by Graal Administration. There is a big difference between seeing no point in doing something and refusing to do something in order to prove a point.

On the subject of this thread, I don't mind how an object has been modeled off our vision of warp points (which was new and not inherited from old Classic). However I do mind the hypocrisy given that certain iClassic staff are said to have complained about the Facebook agreement on the basis of "the servers are too similar".