|
You know you're less credible than the Huffington post? So your illegitemate post saying The Huffington Post isn't credible is not credible itself.
Thanks for letting me know that if I was writing a college paper in which my professors only allow me to use .gov websites or scholarly articles, I would not be allowed to use that as a reference. I greatly appreciate your irrelevant post, criticizing me for using that as a reference in a Graal forum. Your knowledge amazes me.
|
Your ignorance is actually quite hilarious. You'd think that your simple mind might be capable of understanding what "aggregated news" is. However, I think I may have given you too much credit.
So that you now know, an aggregated news site basically steals news and uses other news networks sources for their own writing. Their writers are basically “professional bloggers”, not journalists.
Given, the Huffington post has recently "upped their game" per se, in hiring more legitimate writers along with a few actual journalists. But it does not change the fact that it is an aggregated news site. And even more so, has been listed as one of the top 10 most anti-science websites on the internet, producing a large portion of pseudoscience news.
The Huffington post is merely for entertainment purposes. Unless the writer is qualified to write about that subject, it’s not a credible source.