Graalians - View Single Post - Squad Transfering Rules Need To Be Changed.

Skt A. Sangue · 07-01-2016

I'll refer phrases in this thread as a Zonian would k... Cus I'm a Zonian. Mk.

If you play Zone you would know that I do no own Sangue anymore. I gave it to Dizz to give it to Adrien while I owned Coracao. Dizz died. This thread is not about Dizz, and I really do not want to hear any "oh wow, he died and all you care about is your squad" remarks. I've gotten those in the Zone sub-forum and I believe I have already justified my case.

I've sent multiple tickets. I've had multiple tickets sent from friends. I do not think that the problem lies with reasoning to believe that we are making this story up. They simply won't give us the squad back as there was no direct proof of intent that he would be giving the squad back.

Despite sending photos of a chat between Dizz and I recently showing how he was still following my orders, and that there was a direct conversation that Dizz and Adrien were planning to get on at a specific time to transfer the squad to her, there is still not ample evidence that Dizz would have given me the squad back in their eyes.

For anyone who bases, you know that even just a week without basing will throw your entire squad off balance. I have already given Coracao back to Poop in the case that they do transfer Sangue over, but with the intent that we base on the Sangue tag again... well nobody but me has powers. So we cannot really do much at the moment.

I find that as the founder of Currently Unavailable in 2012, later renamed to Sangue in 2013, the leader from 0 hours to 1000, and the overall head of the group that we have formed, it's clear that I should be given authority to handle MY squad. Apparently not.

Similar situations where someone owning a squad when they are not meant to permanently own it has occured before, on all the servers. What are we leaders supposed to do? Ask the people we sign our squads off to, to sign a document? No. This rule is flawed. Areus was never given back to the proper leader on Zone. In fact nobody in the squad currently even has the 1K hat. Dizz is dead. The squad essentially is now too without ownership.

I feel that if it is proven that the squad was given as a temporary thing, and like wasn't sold(which is illegal btw), the clear founder/head leader should be given authority. This would also apply to cases in which the current owner is inactive, or you know... dead.

If anyone was wondering, these have been the messages I have recieved from TS.

"Yet we are not allowed to transfer the ownership of the guild until the leader has been offline for at least 365 days or you bring prood of the reason. This is to ensure that you weren't going against someones will and simply take over the guild of someone who is on vacation or something similar. We hope you understand.

Sincerely,
GraalOnline Zone Support"

"it doesn't matter who owned the squad at what time for what reason, or who founded the squad or who spent the most time basing. It matters what the leader has to say right now or whom he wants to give it to. To be blunt, you are not the leader, I double checked inGame. The leader hasn't been on for a few days.

After 365 of the leaders inactivity we are allowed to disband the guild and then you are allowed to take the name. Yet you have no proof the leader intended you to have it back. So there is nothing we can do about it. Sorry about that."

07-01-2016	1
Skt A. Sangue TheRealSKT Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Skybase. Posts: 789	Squad Transfering Rules Need To Be Changed. I'll refer phrases in this thread as a Zonian would k... Cus I'm a Zonian. Mk. If you play Zone you would know that I do no own Sangue anymore. I gave it to Dizz to give it to Adrien while I owned Coracao. Dizz died. This thread is not about Dizz, and I really do not want to hear any "oh wow, he died and all you care about is your squad" remarks. I've gotten those in the Zone sub-forum and I believe I have already justified my case. I've sent multiple tickets. I've had multiple tickets sent from friends. I do not think that the problem lies with reasoning to believe that we are making this story up. They simply won't give us the squad back as there was no direct proof of intent that he would be giving the squad back. Despite sending photos of a chat between Dizz and I recently showing how he was still following my orders, and that there was a direct conversation that Dizz and Adrien were planning to get on at a specific time to transfer the squad to her, there is still not ample evidence that Dizz would have given me the squad back in their eyes. For anyone who bases, you know that even just a week without basing will throw your entire squad off balance. I have already given Coracao back to Poop in the case that they do transfer Sangue over, but with the intent that we base on the Sangue tag again... well nobody but me has powers. So we cannot really do much at the moment. I find that as the founder of Currently Unavailable in 2012, later renamed to Sangue in 2013, the leader from 0 hours to 1000, and the overall head of the group that we have formed, it's clear that I should be given authority to handle MY squad. Apparently not. Similar situations where someone owning a squad when they are not meant to permanently own it has occured before, on all the servers. What are we leaders supposed to do? Ask the people we sign our squads off to, to sign a document? No. This rule is flawed. Areus was never given back to the proper leader on Zone. In fact nobody in the squad currently even has the 1K hat. Dizz is dead. The squad essentially is now too without ownership. I feel that if it is proven that the squad was given as a temporary thing, and like wasn't sold(which is illegal btw), the clear founder/head leader should be given authority. This would also apply to cases in which the current owner is inactive, or you know... dead. If anyone was wondering, these have been the messages I have recieved from TS. "Yet we are not allowed to transfer the ownership of the guild until the leader has been offline for at least 365 days or you bring prood of the reason. This is to ensure that you weren't going against someones will and simply take over the guild of someone who is on vacation or something similar. We hope you understand. Sincerely, GraalOnline Zone Support" "it doesn't matter who owned the squad at what time for what reason, or who founded the squad or who spent the most time basing. It matters what the leader has to say right now or whom he wants to give it to. To be blunt, you are not the leader, I double checked inGame. The leader hasn't been on for a few days. After 365 of the leaders inactivity we are allowed to disband the guild and then you are allowed to take the name. Yet you have no proof the leader intended you to have it back. So there is nothing we can do about it. Sorry about that."