|
I agree with this, but not in a context relating to Graal due to a bunch of different circumstances.
Look at how much easier PKing is now compared to back then due to mobs and a higher playercount. Doesn't it seem strange to compare Anyu and Xenthic all-time when the data is so skewed due to how completely different it is?
The same goes for towering. My last post explains what I think of towering back then compared to towering right now. With the guild system changing soon, it may be even more skewed. We might have a towering environment where the highest number of hours a guild gets per day is 10, and there are 20-30 other guilds that get between 0-9 hours daily. Is it really relevant at that point to compare those guilds against CoM having 20k on a leaderboard?
|
I agree, it is different. But games progress, and aspects of the game do change. It's not really comparing, rather showing the current best people in that activity. You'll never be able to measure the true all-time value, but number-wise, you can. Some people want to compete past a 3 month period, and current all-time leaderboards is a good way to create that next level up.