|
I'd actually like to see that reference.
|
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Jobs.htm
There's a lot on there that I am seriously opposed to his opinion. I think that a lot of what he says isn't backed up, and simply isn't true. If you want me to do an analysis on it, I will. But what I want you to look at is where he is asked about outsourcing jobs to China. His only answer is "You haven't hired anybody.".
http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/08...omo-part-2.cnn
He has the power to take a lot of jobs which generate a substantial profitw and bring them over to the US. But he hasn't. How can you believe he truly cares about the country?
You could argue that he would move the jobs back to the US if he became president. But is that what it's going to take? He's gonna say **** all and keep his jobs in China unless we elect him?
|
I've thought about Trump quite a bit, and he generally (although recently, he doesn't seem to be) admits that he did what many people dislike. I find that a good thing, if he would use that to benefit the country, because he would know many of the issues that businesses and the rich take advantage of. It really boils down to his intentions, and he's crazy about his ego and legacy, so I hope he would use that experience to benefit the country...
|
Now we are going to hire Soul of Ninjas to revamp the tower system since they have a lot of experience with Towering.
We were to hire Bin Laden as head of the FBI's Anti Terrorist organization since he knows a lot about avoiding them, but he clearly died so nah.
We are going to hire a couple Crime Lords to take care of the DEA since they know a lot about drug smuggling.
You see what I'm trying to imply? If you're part of the problem, abusing loopholes or whatnot, why should we put you in charge of fixing them? How do we know you're not just going to try to benefit off of the responsibility of doing so.
Hell, here's a good example. You've been in charge of a GP team before. Would you hire a hacker to be on your team? You could argue that they would know how to find and prevent hackers, sure. But Slim over on Classic was a GP, and he ain't no more. Used his power to his advantage to take over a tower.
|
As for the drug problem, I know this may start an entire other issue, but I would like drugs to remain illegal
|
May I ask why?
|
I'd also like the NSA abilities to be used toward serious crimes against others such as gang activity and drug lords. I personally don't care if they listen to my conversation with my Dad in order to rule me out. That's an entire other discussion, though. As with the idea that this would piss off Mexico...
|
This makes me think you assume all Mexicans are drug dealers....
|
They obviously won't like it, and very well may do something to get back at us (such as raise prices) but we are being dealt the short straw in our trade deals and something needs to be done about it, even if it has nothing to do with the wall. I tried finding the article again but couldn't, but I believe I saw a few weeks ago an article that said how much of the money that is transferred from America to Mexico goes to their own government, and it was a surprisingly high number... Yea, it would have an effect on families in Mexico, but it would be used as a tool against the Mexican government. Honestly, you can't do anything without pissing someone off, and America is the ones who should be pissed off for dealing with incompetent leaders who put us in situations like this where we're being taken advantage of.
|
Yes, but why would you want to piss someone off when there's no payout? If you take everything I say individually you can nitpick at it, but if you look at the entire picture you'd be justifying strategies to fund something as effective as attack butterflies.