That's called kitman, as stated in an earlier post. It's perfectly fine for them to lie and be deceptive if it means to gain the trust of non-believers.
ISIS is not the first terrorist group that represents Islam. It's not even up for debate that the religion is plagued by violence and intolerance. People love saying that not all Muslims are terrorists, but that's an empty statement. You should be asking what all terrorists are, and nearly all terrorists end up being Muslim. Is that just some strange coincidence?
We're never going to be able to fight the problem until people like you get real about it and stop making some disconnect between Islam and violence. It does not matter if people catchphrase it as a "religion of peace" or if there are hugs and kisses in the Quran. None of that excuses the religion for the terror and violence it's bringing to the world. |
But do the ends justify the means of your
implied solution?
If I interpreted it correctly, I think what you're saying is that Muslims should be stripped of their freedom of religion in order to rid the world of its disease -- terrorism. But we're yet to figure out
how exactly we can/will do that.
Or, if Trump becomes president, we can build an entire wall to restrict Muslims from entering the country. Perhaps others should do the same.
Just kidding, that's an utterly terrible and highly expensive project.