|
Exactly. The towering players of classic shouldn't dictate something that will affect a mass majority of the other players, whether they participate in towering or not. Use your brain ffs
|
Who said it would affect social guilds? They can still ally, when they categorize themselves as social.
Is this all because I didn't want to stay on your vampiri family tag or whatever?
|
While the system would work for social guilds I don't think it would be fair to tweak the entire system for just certain types of guilds and try and find ways to make it work for other kinds of guilds. Classic is made up of various types of activities - sparring, towering, PKing, socializing, and guilds should be able to encompass all of these factors of Classic.
Also, lots of people like to be in multiple guilds, and some have guilds where the only members are their friends just for the sake of keeping them all in one place. While many guilds are just chatrooms/places to talk, many players enjoy these types of guilds as they encompass the social side of Classic.
Also, Aguzo, I never said towering/sparring/PKing guilds weren't social. I'm sure you know what I meant by that, as many players refer to social guilds as guilds who do not/rarely partake in these activities.
|
True, there are multiple guilds. They last what? 1 week, everyone is usually only loyal to one guild. I have so many tags.
Only allowing 1 guild would fix the following:
Guilds using low score to spar against guilds with a higher score, so they can lower them on the ladder.
Maybe the server would have an easier time with less data stored.
Gtg, so I can't add anymore.
Don't think that I am a mean person, Yeah, I also have a ton of guilds that have a lot of memories, but I am willing to sacrifice my guilds and saved guild names to just be in 1 single guild. Then it would actually be "Guilds are for life, not just..." (The perils of guild something something)