It's easy to gang up on Antago because he takes things to the extreme, but there is truth to what he says is if you bring it down like 10 notches. Like the influence on media and how it tries to get you to think what they want(brainwashing to an extent).
Now analyze this sequence here and tell me Antago is wrong.
|
If I were to put some hick and a man in a turban beside each other and asked anyone on the planet who is more likely to be the one to bomb or shoot up innocent people, don't even try to pretend like you don't know which one would be pointed at. That's not an issue of racism or hatred either, that's called reality. One bad apple doesn't spoil the whole tree, but too many bad apples and it's time to dig it up by the roots.
|
|
Wow. Okay, this is specifically hate speech. Put a black & a white man in front of wealthy white America, and ask them who is more likely to kill. Oh, yes, let's all now begin targeting blacks. You know nothing about Islam, and your words really gave me one of the grossest vibes I have ever felt.
|
|
You're in complete denial if you refuse to allow your brain to accept statistical facts... I don't know what to tell you. If "X is statistically more likely to commit Y crime than Z" is hate speech to you, you're way too sensitive.
Do you think it's hateful to make statements that can be proven through data? Like, "blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes against blacks" or "whites are more likely to commit financial crimes?" I can't imagine how reality is so triggering... It's a simple fact that Muslims are more likely than any other religion to kill innocent people.
|
What Thallen wants to say is that Muslims are more
likely kill for their religion/religion reasons than any other religion. That's what he wants to say, but the way he's wording his post they're saying something else. Killing and killing for religion have different stats. Antago is answering to what he's reading. Think about it