Elaborate, because if you're referring to his suggestion that we temporarily pause the admission of Muslim immigrants to this country, then that isn't hate... We're in a war that is being forced upon us by radical Islam. Our Constitution doesn't apply to terrorists. We don't have to let terrorists, or anyone who might be a terrorist, into this country if we feel like that's the necessary safety precaution.
This isn't new, we did this in WW2 and it was a lot harsher. Not only did we not let them in this country, we took 100,000 people living in America with Japanese ancestry and we completely relocated or incarcerated them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...nese_Americans
You won't win the war against terrorism by flinching and tiptoeing around every policy at the off chance that you might offend a Muslim... |
When he came out he started going off on illegal immigrants (Mexicans) and how they were the problem. He made it ok to be hateful towards the illegal immigrants that were ruining this country. San Bernardino (happens to be 30 minutes away from me) shootings occur and now it's the Muslims' turn to get the hate.
I don't know the statistics, but targeting a religion with X amount of members because 1% of them are lunny doesn't sound logical. I don't know how easy it is for others to enter the US legally, but it's almost impossible for Mexican and anybody south of them(not counting rich people)
The US already does a good job at screening applicants.
Now lets talk about the refugees. We can do the moral thing and help people that are fleeing their war torn countries or let them fend for themselves.
|
Saudi Arabia is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, they're in Yemen. Qatar is spending billions on the World Cup, ISIS is at their doorstep. They don't care, because they know that once this issue reaches its boiling point the US will send in its military and the US taxpayers will come out of their pockets to fight someone else's war.
We'll be investing another 10 years of ground troops towards stabilizing a region that is not able to be stabilized. "But you took their oil," we should be taking their oil. We should be taking the resources we need to take to pay off the debt that they're putting us in when we're fighting their war. Oil is the biggest profit niche for ISIS, so you tell me who you'd rather see the oil of Iraq and Syria in the hands of?
|
I see what you're saying, but wasn't the US one of the contributors to the current problem? Wasn't Iraq somewhat stabilized when Hussein was in power?
|
Who's forcing America to fight the war for Middle East...no one.They can do it themselves.Why intervene...OH yes! because you want to. You want a part in the oil because that's the most profitable business in the world right now. But,when the Middle East didn't want to share their oil..."Let's do the 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden **** so we can get a reason to take it for us." Oh mind me,America entered Iraq a long time ago.
Face it, the current world power can't take on a bunch of terrorist militants who have no professional training whatsoever...But they seem trained to me, i mean not everyone can pick up a fight with America and survive like this. Because you people spawned Taliban/AL Quaeda and trained them to fight Russia. After it ended,you wanted to take their land too and now all of this is happening.
|
Beside the oil I would say they prefer a more westernized version of the middle east. That would make it easier to control and manipulate. Imagine the US controlling the middle east? cashinggggg
