|
What's stupid about it? It gives you enough time to have some political leadership experience before being eligible to become the president. I don't see anything stupid about that.
also ITT people who have absolutely no idea how economics work.
Honestly I prefer a few of the current Republic candidates over anyone in the Democratic party right now. Both sides look grim for the next election though as is.
|
Highly disagree because I don't think 'political leadership' is or should be considered necessary for the presidency.
|
Or people voting for Clinton because she is a woman. That's not funny, it's sad. Pretty sad. But yea, I think elections in America are a pretty big fail since the Bush incident.
|
Idk I think that's kinda a strawman put out by the GOP. A very small minority might, but a lot of people who vote for her based on her gender will likely be doing so, not just blindly because she
is a woman, but because she plans to implement certain policies that support women. It's like how in 2008/12 lots of African Americans voted for Obama. They didn't just do it because he was black; they would have voted democratic anyways because democrats tend to better meet their objectives in society.