|
03-16-2015
|
52
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 521
|
|
"Second off: you continuously make the mistake of comparing Graal, which is a small, game company, with larger and richer industries, such as Taco Bell. They are not the same thing. Taco Bell takes the opinion of the majority who has not be influenced by any other source. (i.e. McDonald's paying people to convince Taco Bell to change their meat is an example of people being influenced.) So by you telling people to give one star ratings on the App Store because you think they should? Well, in your own way, you're taking away their freedom of speech. Maybe people want to approach this in a much maturer way. So when you tell people to give a one star rating, they may not want to, and you end up un-coordinated and everything is just a big mess. And when they see that happening, they don't take you to seriously."
Primarily this. For some reason I thought I had read more dealing with the freedom of speech nonsense itself, but upon looking back there were more examples in other parts of his argument that would have fit better than this one. That being said, this is still an example.
|
You are confusing me. You say I see to lack comprehension skills, which prevents me from making educated posts, and now you're saying one of my other examples would have fit better for this?
|
|
|
|