I don't want to quote the whole thing so space is taken up, but this is in reply to Common Sense.

I'm not saying this because you disagree with me. But a lot of what you used to back up your argument simply does not make sense. Your elaborations on what freedom of speech is defined as and how it's used in this sense are frankly wrong in their application, as are a few other statements made that I'm not going to list for the sake of being concise. Your opinion is not what I was referring to in my post, it's what you used to back it up. I'm fine with different opinions, anyone who isn't is living in some alternate universe. But as far as evidence or facts you use to back them up, I find little to no thought put into it, or perhaps just incorrect thought. While statements can be opinionated, the facts used to arrive at that conclusion can be proven true or false.