I think it's ironic when people who have never developed try to debate topics like this
|
Posted by dusty
Originally Posted by Dusty View Post
Sadly a lot of the development on Classic involves working within the systems of the server(and default client mechanics) and dealing with the many conflicts that can occur. Diving was a massive pain in the ass to get working correctly, for example. That's not even touching on how troublesome it becomes when the project is very large, and overlaps current live content. Despite the fact I had done the overworld portion of the railroads early on in the railroad content, I had to completely redo them again the week before the release because the levels on dev were so out of date by the time it was finished.
|
I am going to revive this simply because it says a lot about this topic, |
Colin I consider you my homie so dont take this reply as an attack.
Debating actual development(how it works) and being a lack of development is two different things. Personally I think the quote that you used shows a good reason why this "debate" was good for the community.
People complain about lack of content, then staff complain about players complaining, so it just goes in circles.
Hopefully people have been reading this thread and now have a better understanding as to why content cant be produced as fast as they want. Lack of talent, roadblocks to working on classic, management not approving projects, dusty's quote and so on. For the most part I feel this thread has been productive with the exception of those 2 noobs that keep arguing.
