No it really wasn't. I played at launch and to me the M16a3 was as good as AK-74M. It's like saying the colt m1911 is op. Anyone with skill could have killed a person with a m16a3. The gun is not OP. You wanna see OP guns? Hop on COD.
|
Ok ok ok, so you are telling me, a gun with 800RPM, something a little bit more recoil (i think it was by .08) and a way faster t2k is not OP? Go onto any battlefield forum and ask if the m16a3 was not OP. the m16a3 was the god gun of bf3 hands down. If you think it wasnt OP fine (you are blessed with not being so nit picky about this stuff unlike me) there was though 2 guns that were OP at launch that can not be argued, PKP ca-ching and the USAS12 frag
It requires skill to overpower the rippers something you obviously don't have. Stop crying because you suck and learn how to beat them. It may be overpowered but it isn't that hard to kill players who use Rippers. The APRs are balanced fine the way they are.
|
Holy shat im surrounded by ****ing ******s. Why is this always the go to excuse for OP guns? If you have ever seen me base on conquest before, im no easy target and i personally have no problems at all with taking down rippers. What my problem is that how im always put at such a large disadvantage vs others and competitive gameplay turning into a ripper master race.
Tl;dr
Why invest time in building up skill when instead they could fork 20$ over and get a more powerful weapon, get into action of the game instantly and dominate with this.