Well, I believe the case itself is a bit too sensitive for the general public. Too much misinformation, lies, and mutated statements. Imagine the internet playing a game of telephone, there are more than 7 billion people in the world, but only a few of them have access to credible information. How many slight changes to a statement, or misunderstood "broad spectrum answers" does it take before it is completely devoid of facts?


^^P.S My whole paragraph was very broad, not giving a direct answer on my allegiance. If you assumed I held some sort of standing, well then, I am very sorry to say you already might have been tricked by the slur of these that can be found in the trial. I am in fact neutral on the situation and further awaiting new facts even though the verdict has been set.

Sorry for the odd language, working on a fan fiction. XD